TECHNET Archives

October 2010

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:44:48 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (128 lines)
Joyce,

We have nitrogen in the reflow ovens with max O2 levels of 500 ppm.  Our
facility humidity is controlled and within a range of 35 to 45%.

We also have nitrogen pumping at the wave bath.

Leland

-----Original Message-----
From: Joyce Koo [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 8:37 AM
To: [log in to unmask]; Leland Woodall
Subject: Re: [TN] Detecting Oxidation Levels of PTH

Not nitrogen reflow prior to wave? How many times SMT before wave? What
is the humidity contorl on the floor?
--------------------------
Sent using BlackBerry


----- Original Message -----
From: Leland Woodall [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 08:32 AM
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [TN] Detecting Oxidation Levels of PTH

OSP over copper, lead-free, SAC 305 process.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tan Geok Ang [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 8:23 PM
To: TechNet E-Mail Forum; Leland Woodall
Subject: RE: [TN] Detecting Oxidation Levels of PTH

ImAg Boards?

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Leland Woodall
Sent: Friday, 15 October 2010 3:49 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Detecting Oxidation Levels of PTH

Techies,

We have one assembly that sporadically experiences insufficient solder
fill of plated through holes at the wave soldering process.

If we cross section one of these, what testing equipment is best suited
to detect the presence of oxidation on the PTH walls?  What would be
considered an unacceptable level that would prevent 100% climb?

Thanks in advance for your responses!

Leland

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
[log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
[log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information, privileged material (including material protected by the
solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute
non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than
the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this
transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete
this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or
reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not
authorized and may be unlawful.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2