Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:33:16 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hypothetical situation...
Just surmising.
-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:09 PM
To: [log in to unmask]; Glidden, Kevin
Cc: [log in to unmask]
Subject: RE: PTH reliability - pad to surface trace
Kevin.
A photo is worth one thousand words.
"X,
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Glidden, Kevin
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:02 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] PTH reliability - pad to surface trace
I've been reading about PTH reliability, mainly through Paul Reid's articles and old TN posts from Werner....
If you have a PTH with a surface trace attached to the top side pad, would there be more stress (and thus propensity for cracking / separation between the pad and joining trace) at the pad / trace interface area with a smaller or larger pad size?
The "pad rotation" pivots about the knee. A larger pad dia puts the pad-to-trace connection further away from the pivot point and thus the interface area would be subjected to greater deflection. Alternately, a smaller pad area (I believe 6012 requires .002" min) would have less connecting surface area ???
Or is the pad to trace interconnection not a primary failure mode when compared to barrel or corner cracks?
Thanks!
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|