TECHNET Archives

August 2010

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Thu, 26 Aug 2010 11:04:35 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (134 lines)
Carl -- have you thot about an epoxy dot as strain releif?  cheap 
insurance perhaps, tho a tru RC is more elegant -- cheers -- Ian



Carl VanWormer <[log in to unmask]> 
Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
08/26/2010 10:38 AM
Please respond to
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; Please respond to
Carl VanWormer <[log in to unmask]>


To
[log in to unmask]
cc

Subject
[TN] soldered battery wire - breaking problem






We produce a small module that is powered by a small battery in a
plastic battery holder that has the standard red & black wires, which
solder into two holes in in our PC board.  After initial functional
testing, the board (with battery holder attached) is sent out for
conformal coating, then the boards are re-tested before inserting into
our plastic enclosure.  The most recent run of 50 boards returned from
conformal coating with about 10 broken wires, with the break leaving
Copper colored ends visible where the strands were ripped from the
solder filled mounting hole.  Since this problem is new, something in
the assembly process (or conformal coating process) must have changed.
Once the battery holder and board are assembled into the plastic case,
there is no more strain on the wires, so this is only a production and
handling problem.

 

In reviewing the recent wire solder joints, compared to 2 samples from
previous runs that did not exhibit this problem, I noticed that the
"bad" assemblies had been heated enough to flow solder up into the wire
strands, while the "good" assemblies had solder on the wire ends on the
back side of the board, but the solder did not flow up the strands on
the front side of the board.  I'm guessing that the fused wire strands
are stiffer, and this is the cause of the breakage during handling for
the conformal coating process.

 

Many of us "old timers" remember the classic strain relief approach used
in the battery wires for transistor radios, where the two wires were
laced through a strain relief hole before being soldered onto the board.
Since our board has no room for the extra strain relief holes, and since
we have made hundreds of these things without problems, I'm looking for
suggestions on the best approach to solder the wires onto the board to
help eliminate the problem. 

 

Are there any IPC standards for attaching battery holder wires?

 

Thanks,
Carl

 

 

Carl Van Wormer, P.E., AE7GD

Senior Hardware Engineer

Cipher Systems

1800 NW 169th Place, Suite B-100

Beaverton, OR  97006

Cipher Systems (503) 617-7447 x 5163

Direct Line (503) 425-5163

[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> 

This message may contain confidential and/or proprietary information,
and is intended for the person/entity to whom it was originally
addressed. Any use by others is strictly prohibited.  If I sent this to
you by mistake, please be nice and delete it, then tell me of my mistake
so I can send it to the right person.

 


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2