TECHNET Archives

August 2010

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 09:22:18 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (56 lines)
I can't speak to the solderball aspect but we have some customers very
particular about the appearance of their matte soldermask so we too take
extra care with handling (slipsheet. Etc, particularly with a solder coat
finish).  At the end of the day it does not matter if IPC covers these minor
defects or not - if the customer is not happy with the appearance of the
product then something has to be done.

John 
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jack Olson
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 9:12 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Matte Mask and SolderBalls

Greetings,

Here's a situation I'm trying to resolve: An assembly partner requests matte
soldermask to reduce the effect of solderballs. A fabrication partner wants
an extra 3% for matte, Their default is semi-matte or semi-gloss (are those
the same?) explaining that matte boards are slipsheeted throughout
subsequent processes to reduce scratching. I'm tasked with trying to save my
company the 3% increase on every board order. We have designs with both wave
and reflow soldering passes.

I've searched the last ten years of the Technet Archives for every reference
to solderballs and matte soldermask. I learned a lot from previous posts
(THANKS, TECHNET!) and many people have commented on the fact that
solderballs don't stick to matte masks as much as they do to others.

My first question is:
Why doesn't EVERYONE use matte masks if it can mitigate a potential problem
like solderballs?

Secondly:
Are minor soldermask scratches a rejectable condition? I couldn't find any
reference to minor scratching in IPC-SM-840, IPC-6012 or IPC-A-600

onward thru the fog,
Jack


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2