IPC-600-6012 Archives

August 2010

IPC-600-6012@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Dupriest, Don" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Combined Forum of D-33a and 7-31a Subcommittees)
Date:
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:47:43 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (69 lines)
That is what I recall as well; it does not get added to wrap.

C. D. (Don) Dupriest
Lockheed Martin - MFC
Advanced Manufacturing Technology
member of:
Production Technical Excellence Staff 
Ph. 972/603-7724 fax: 972/603-9052
Email: [log in to unmask]


-----Original Message-----
From: IPC-600-6012 [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Buechner, Mark R (US SSA)
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 4:39 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [IPC-600-6012] Class 3/A requirements

Wendi,
The class 3/A requirements for Plating/Coating Thickness only address the requirements for the first two rows (titled "Copper-average" and "Thin areas") of Tables 3-3, 3-4 and 3-5.  At least that is what I believe the intent of the sentence "The following apply to minimum copper average and minimum thin areas:"....which we put in the Class 3/A box in the table.

There was not a separate revised Class 3/A requirement created for the third row of each of the tables ("wrap"), so the values listed for Class 3 "wrap" in each of the three tables is applicable to Class 3/A products.

Mark Buechner
Quality Assurance Engineer
BAE SYSTEMS
Electronics, Intelligence and Support
Phone (603) 885-6503

-----Original Message-----
From: IPC-600-6012 [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Wendi Boger
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 5:07 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [IPC-600-6012] Class 3/A requirements

I need some clarification on the requirement for Plating/Coating
Thickness.  The 3/A page requires additional copper thickness above
class 3 to be added to tables 3-3, 3-4 and 3-5.  Does this also apply to
the minimum wrap thickness?  (Example) Is it required for a
non-conductive filled through via to have .944 mils of wrap (table 3-3)?
It's a bit confusing as it says to apply to minimum copper average and
minimum thin areas.



Wendi







This communication is for use by the intended recipient(s) only and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, proprietary and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, forwarding or copying hereof is strictly prohibited without the express written consent of DDi. If you have received this communication in error or are not the intended recipient, you should destroy the message and any attachments or copies, and you are prohibited from retaining, distributing, disclosing, or using any information contained herein. Please inform us of the erroneous delivery by return e-mail. Thank you for your cooperation.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2