Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | (Combined Forum of D-33a and 7-31a Subcommittees) |
Date: | Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:32:10 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thanks for letting me know - I have to tell you I am still having a hard time with this concept with the amount of copper coming from the surface to around the hole I guess I would have thought it had the capacity to carry the current. I will have to find some articles and get educated!
Denise
Denise J Chevalier
Amphenol Printed Circuits
Quality Engineer
Phone - 603-324-4530
Fax - 603-386-6442
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the
intended recipient(s) and contains confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please reply to the sender by
email and destroy all copies of the original message.
-----Original Message-----
From: IPC-600-6012 [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Paul Reid
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 3:27 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [IPC-600-6012] opinion poll
Hi Denise,
We are sure it was corner cracks that caused the 10% increase in resistance.
The posted picture was from a reliability test on coupons that were on the edge of a production panel. We measured the resistance before testing, during preconditioning (6X260°C) and during testing (thermal cycles to 150°C). We stop testing within seconds of hitting a 10% increase in resistance. Then, since the circuit is not open, we apply a small current while observing the coupon under a thermal camera. In this manor we find the most damaged PTH out of hundreds. The section is processed on the identified PTH and its' immediate neighbors. In this way we are able to observe a failure as it is "ripening". The test method and failure location is elegant and we gain great insight to failure modes using this method.
The picture posted is a typical knee crack that was observed in many PTHs in the section.
Generally speaking, laminar plating is a reliability liability. The pictures Chris posted are classic knee cracks due to lead free thermal excursion.
Cracks of that magnitude, in a significant number of PTHs, would exhibit a functional failure if resistance was being measured on the sample before, during and after thermal cycling.
Sincerely,
Paul Reid
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
|
|