Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 5 Aug 2010 10:30:49 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Wow! I have always had it in my mind that IPC:
- never took a stand on NFPs one way or the other, but
- never recommended removing them, even though many do.
Now you point me to the new draft which contains a whole new section!
(IPC-2222A 9.1.4)
with more than an entire page on the subject!!!
and even a Table!
wow...
How did I miss that?
We probably could have avoided this entire thread if I had known your army of
experts had already worked this out... (grin)
thanks,
Jack
.
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 14:04:02 -0400, Gary Ferrari
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Jack,
>
>The IPC-2221 committee has addressed this issue in the working draft.
>They have discussed removal of NFP's and made a recommendation similar
>to what you and Werner have summarized. The designer may then choose the
>best note path for his/her application requirements. As has been
>mentioned, I do not believe that one could develop a single generic
>note, that would cover every application issue.
>
>Gary
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|