Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:19:32 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
We would count it but agree it is not much to measure.
Denise J Chevalier
Amphenol Printed Circuits
Quality Engineer
Phone - 603-324-4530
Fax - 603-386-6442
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the
intended recipient(s) and contains confidential and privileged
information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please reply to the sender by
email and destroy all copies of the original message.
-----Original Message-----
From: IPC-600-6012 [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Chris
Mahanna
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 8:52 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [IPC-600-6012] wrap and electroless
another opinion poll, of sorts:
With even the most discriminating customers allowing 0.0002" wrap, and
huge aspect ratios leading to thicker electroless, the assumption that
wrapped electroless counts as wrap becomes more and more important. I
assume that everyone is counting it?
Thanks,
Chris
Chris Mahanna
President, Technical Manager
Robisan Laboratory Inc.
6502 E. 21st Street
Indianapolis, Indiana 46219
317-353-6249
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
[log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
|
|