IPC-600-6012 Archives

August 2010

IPC-600-6012@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
IPC-600-6012<[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Combined Forum of D-33a and 7-31a Subcommittees <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:52:25 -0400
Reply-To:
"(Combined Forum of D-33a and 7-31a Subcommittees)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
wrap and electroless
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From:
Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines) 
another opinion poll, of sorts:
With even the most discriminating customers allowing 0.0002" wrap, and huge aspect ratios leading to thicker electroless,  the assumption that wrapped electroless counts as wrap becomes more and more important.  I assume that everyone is counting it?

Thanks,
Chris

Chris Mahanna
President, Technical Manager
Robisan Laboratory Inc.
6502 E. 21st Street
Indianapolis, Indiana 46219
317-353-6249


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2