TECHNET Archives

July 2010

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 2 Jul 2010 13:19:48 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (120 lines)
 Eric,
You need to follow that logic to its conclusion.
Top surface expands more than bottom, thus upwards warpage.
The pregpreg layers cure more towards completion, freezing in some of that warpage which remains after cooling.
Dishing the other way would indicate that perhaps you ave differences in the lay-up
Werner

 


 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Christison <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Fri, Jul 2, 2010 12:10 pm
Subject: Re: [TN] Question about FR4 Curing


Thanks Guy. 
 
Re part two. My question is more to do with what happens to the material once it returns to room temperature? If some curing has taken place will the matrix have changed in volume? 
 
I should explain that the substrate forms the bottom of a very small box so all four edges can be regarded as being rigidly fixed. Normally the substrate becomes dished with the centre pushed into the box wrt the edges. Sometimes though, the substrate dishes the other way which is what is puzzling me. 
 
I have a hypothesis that during flex attach the top surface of the laminate sees ~150 deg C but the bottom surface stays quite cool. In this scenario you can imagine that the matrix near the top surface may cure while the matrix near the bottom stays as it was. If the curing caused an increase in volume of the matrix then the top surface would be bigger than the bottom surface and so the surface would bow upwards i.e. in the opposite direction to the one you'd expect. 
 
Regards, 
 
 
On 02/07/2010 16:40, Guy Ramsey wrote: 
> Our friends at Rockwell have a chart in one of their presentations that show 
> CTE of various common laminates up to a typical reflow temp. 
> At room temp CTE of them is about 25ppm /degree C. But, by 150 C things get 
> less predictable. And can be 75 ppm / degree. 
> 
> The thing is you are trying to attach a flex. What is its CTE. The 
> difference between the two? It is important. 
> 
> Part two of your question The Z axis expansion of the woven substrate will 
> be higher than the "x-y" advertized CTE. So, no I would not expect the 
> material to shrink. What happens of the flex expands wildly above 100 C, you 
> might think the substrate shrank . . . 
> 
> Guy 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Eric Christison 
> Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 11:12 AM 
> To: [log in to unmask] 
> Subject: [TN] Question about FR4 Curing 
> 
> I'm wondering about an issue we have with the dimensional stability of a 
> substrate made of FR4. 
> 
> We're finding it's deforming during a flex attach operation, not by much 
> but enough to cause us a problem. We use ACF and a hot bar. The 
> substrate sees a temperature of 155 deg C for about 10 seconds. Someone 
> suggested that the movement may be due to incomplete curing of the 
> substrate. 
> 
> I'm wondering if a temperature of 150 deg C for 10 seconds is likley to 
> have any effect at all on the matrix. 
> 
> If it did, would the volume of the matrix increase, decrease or stay 
> much the same? 
> 
> I realise that we'll see deformation due the application of pressure as 
> well but in some instances the substrate seems to be moving in the wrong 
> direction. 
> 
> Thanks, 
> 
>     
-- Eric Christison 
Consumer&  Micro group 
Imaging Division 
 
STMicroelectronics (R&D) Ltd 
33 Pinkhill 
Edinburgh EH12 7BF 
United Kingdom 
 
Tel:    +44 (0)131 336 6165 
Fax:    + 44 (0)131 336 6001 
 
 
______________________________________________________________________ 
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. 
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________ 
 
--------------------------------------------------- 
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in 
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet 
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) 
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest 
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives 
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815 
----------------------------------------------------- 

 

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2