TECHNET Archives

July 2010

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:37:32 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (52 lines)
This is a good thread. 

Off-line Ian Hanna from Circuit Tech comments:  

"Hey Paul,  I would expect that the biggest threat from trapped moisture is the vapour pressures generated during the initial shock of assembly...would this be visible during cyclic reliability testing?  Regards - Ian"

The answer to Ian's question is, yes, the greatest "threat" (or at least pressure) from trapped moisture is during the initial thermal excursion and yes it is visible during reliability testing. But no we do not see delamination during the first thermal cycle and if the material delaminates the effect is extended cycles to failure. The lesson is you have to test both the copper and the material when doing reliability testing for lead/free applications incase the material degrades and you get false positives from thermal cycle testing. We measure material damage by means of changes in capacitance in representative coupons in order to capture material damage.

Basically we are saying that many studies demonstrate limited impact, positive or negative, on reliability due to baking. Dr. Taube shows "moisture in" or "moisture out" has a limited reliability affect. The effect of baking is not compelling for extending ability to survive assembly and rework.

The idea is that vapor pressure from trapped water "blows" the material apart. It is my contention that if the adhesion between laminated surfaces is weak, by that I mean, between B-stage and C-stage or B-stage and copper, then vapor pressure generated from trapped water may cause frank delamination. But there is more to this story.

I expect the greatest pressure from water vapor would occur during heating on the first thermal excursion because the board has the greatest amount of water at the beginning of assembly. After the first cycle moisture must have been out gassing during the thermal excursion. The longer at temperature the less water in the board so by the second thermal excursion there should be less pressure because some of the water has been lost. Our findings are consistent with Dr. Taube's findings. Delamination does not typically occur on the first thermal cycle. Delamination frequently occurs after the third thermal excursion. Let's let that stand for a second.

Dr. Wayne Rothschild points out that the vapor pressure is limited by the amount of water available to the system. He points out that the gas laws take into account the amount of water in the system.

Pressure increases rapidly with "live steam" but, when the water is all vaporized, the pressure increase is reduced. "Live steam" requires liquid water as a source to replace the steam. A steam train stops when it runs out of water. The vapor pressure goes to zero once the water escapes out of the board. 

So bringing Dr. Taube's and Dr. Rothschild's observations, our experience in reliability testing, and how samples fail in T260 testing on a TMA,  together, I feel that the damage to material is from vapor pressure, z-axis expansion and also material degradation. The epoxy system is failing and volatiles are providing a force as is z-axis expansion of the epoxy system, to a point were force is greater than the strength of the epoxy and the board fails. Epoxy degradation is a major component of the failures and aggressive baking could degrade the epoxy reducing reliability in a lead/free application.

All this stands given that the copper is not being degraded by 260°C, which I, and others are beginning expect it is changing, when the copper is poorly plated and of a lower quality. But that is another story. 



Sincerely, 
Paul Reid 

Program Coordinator 
PWB Interconnect Solutions Inc. 
235 Stafford Rd., West, Unit 103 
Nepean, Ontario 
Canada, K2H 9C1 
613 596 4244 ext. 229 
Skype paul_reid_pwb 
[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> 


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2