TECHNET Archives

June 2010

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Uppina Nagaraj <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:34:46 +0530
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (174 lines)
Hi Bev,

Thanks for the quick reply and inputs.

The product that I've written is built to IPC-6012, Class B.

Best Regards,
U.Nagaraj


> Uppina,
> Wow! LOTS of questions. I can only answer some.
>
> 1) Yes, generally ENIG boards store better than HASL boards.  HASL board
> solderability decreases because of growth of oxide and growth of
> intermetallic.  If the HASL layer is thin the intermetallic can reach the
> surface sooner and then, well, it ain't going to solder.
>
> Vacuum packing can increase the shelf life of finishes that can oxidize.
> This assumes excellent packaging, not stored so long there are
> intermetallic problems, etc., etc.
>
> For a  lot more on this get the IPC series of docs on surface finishes. I
> can't remember the numbers, but I am sure someone else will respond with
> those.
>
> 2) Photos to TechNet get stripped out.  Either sent to Steve Gregory or
> post on the IPC site.
> Question to you: what IPC class of product are you building?
>
> Bev
> RIM
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Uppina Nagaraj
> Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 7:30 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [TN] Query on shelf life of PCBs & impact on solderability
>
> Dear All,
>
> I have 3 queries in all.....
>
> 1. One of our customer has changed the surface finish from HASL
>    to ENIG. Their main reason for this change was that they
>    have had a bad experience with storage of HASL finished boards
>    (the reason for which is not shared with us). They had encountered
> solderability problems on the HASL finished board which they
>    had stored for a period of time.
>
>    Their expectation with Gold plated surface is the storage
>    of the PCBs can be for a longer period of time as compared to
>    HASL finish.
>
>    Initially they had a requirement for 1micron thick electrolytic gold,
> but later on they changed the requirement for an ENIG process with
> gold around 0.05 to 0.10 microns.
>
>    Now my question......
>
>    Is there any guideline on the shelf life of the PCBs (with regard to
> solderability) of the following surface finishes....
>
>    a) ENIG
>    b) HASL
>    c) Immersion Tin
>    d) Electrolytic Ni and electrolytic gold with Gold thickness
>       of 1.0microns
>
>    Will vacuum packing help to extend the shelf life?
>
> 2. One of our customer is doing hand soldering of PCBs with ENIG finish.
>    They're inserting a strand of tinned Copper wires from component side
> and later on using soldering iron to do the soldering from the solder
> side.
>
>    The solder is able to flow up from solder side to component side, but
> the solder is unable to complete wet the pad on the component side.
>
>    I've attached the photos of example of the phenomenon. These photos are
> without the wire, I've just used bare PCBs to do the soldering to
> illustrate the phenomenon.
>
>
>    Now my question....
>
>    a) Will increasing the volume of the solder help in complete wetting
>       of the pads on the component side?
>    b) Any other way to get a full coverage on the pads on the component
>       side.
>
> 3. This question is about the same customer which I've mentioned in
>    para 2 above, is doing hand soldering. In one of the stage of
>    component assembly, they're (hand) soldering a flexible PCB
>    on the ENIG finished rigid PCBs.
>
>    They have a unique practice during this stage of soldering. They've
> explained to us that this particular component is very sensitive to
> high temperature and hence the soldering iron temperature is set at
> 210Deg C. They're using Sn60/Pb40 solder for this soldering operation.
> After the soldering iron achieves 210Deg C, they're  turning off the
> power to the soldering iron and doing the soldering of the flexi PCB
> onto the rigi PCBs. We'll not know the actual
>    soldering iron temperature at the point of contact.
>
>    They've complained to us that the soldering is poor.
>
>    We know that the melting temperature of solder is around 183deg C. But,
>
>    is there any guideline on the minimum temperature for soldering to get
> a good flow of solder and completely wetted solder?
>
> Thanks for your inputs in advance.
>
> Best Regards,
> U.Nagaraj
> MICROPACK Ltd,
> Bangalore, INDIA.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
> for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
> information, privileged material (including material protected by the
> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public
> information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,
> please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from
> your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this
> transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be
> unlawful.
>
>



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2