TECHNET Archives

June 2010

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 12 Jun 2010 14:12:22 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (119 lines)
I was at the AIA-PERM meeting this past week.  There there were no negative comments on the method of reballing 63/37 (replacing RoHS balls).

Many MIL/aerospace products must be reballed as lead-free reliability cannot be calculated.  

Reballing (with the proper inspection techniques and removal process (air knife is one technique) is an acceptable process.

See http://www.acqp2.nasa.gov/LFS%20Reliability/Premier%20BGA%20Presentation%207-28-08.pdf

Also http://www.smta.org/knowledge/proceedings_abstract.cfm?PROC_ID=2484

Title :    	  LEAD FREE TO SnPb BGA REBALLING PROCESS AND RELIABILITY
Author :   	William Beair and William Vuono
Author Company :   Raytheon Company
Date : 	08/17/2008    Conference : SMTA International
 
Abstract : As the electronics industry continues to transition to a lead free environment, component suppliers are phasing out the standard SnPb alloy process for BGA balls and termination surface finishes. High reliability products that require comprehensive product qualification may not readily transition to a “mixed” system solution (lead free components and tin-lead solder joints). As an alternative, some customers are “reballing”, or replacing lead free BGA balls with SnPb alloy balls. However, the reliability of the reballed devices is not known.

The reballing process has been characterized as to solder composition, temperature profiles required for successful reflow, shear strength of resultant solder joints, solder ball size/consistency and component physical damage resulting from reballing. Reliability has been assessed by thermal cycling, and compared to that of conventional SnPb components. 

Bob Landman
H&L Instruments, LLC 

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Werner Engelmaier
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 2:36 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] rohs, BGAs & assembly

 Hi Paul,
I have seen no evidence that reballing produces assemblies of lesser reliability.
Werner

  

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Thu, Jun 10, 2010 1:20 pm
Subject: Re: [TN] rohs, BGAs & assembly


I Agree with Nigel...



If the time-temperature product is high enough to produce mixing the bulk solder 

joint should be good but not perfect...



However it is all a compromise anyway...If you can get only RoHS balls on BGAs 

and you need to use 6337 for the connection, the process of reballing will 

introduce undetectable additional defect sites in the component that will lead 

to decreased reliability of the final product and you will loose the reliability 

edge you are attempting to gain...



Paul



Paul Edwards

Surface Art Engineering





-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nigel Burtt

Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 8:33 AM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [TN] rohs, BGAs & assembly



Will be OK providing your assembly can withstand high enough reflow 

temperature to get the RoHS balls to melt. usually problem is not with the 

BGA, but with other parts that won't like to get that hot!



NPL in the UK have public domain technical papers on this which you can 

download from their website 



---------------------------------------------------


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2