TECHNET Archives

May 2010

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 21 May 2010 07:19:08 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (351 lines)
Distance from neutral point (center of the component)
Bev

----- Original Message -----
From: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Fri May 21 07:12:40 2010
Subject: Re: [TN] Solder joint height

Thanks for your reply, Werner.

DNP?  I'm trying to figure that one out.  Something to do with elastic modulii?  Or is it number of cycles?

I got the 1.5mil number from the Amkor paper, BOARD LEVEL ASSEMBLY AND RELIABILITY CONSIDERATIONS
FOR QFN TYPE PACKAGES.  Someone pointed that paper out on this forum a few months ago.  That's why I decided to try the pin probe technique.

Wayne

________________________________
From: Werner Engelmaier [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 6:30 PM
To: [log in to unmask]; Thayer, Wayne - IIW
Subject: Re: [TN] Solder joint height

Hy Wayne,
Well, those QFNs and LCCs are deja vu all over again.  With LLCCCs we had an obvious huge CTE-mismatch between ceramic and FR-4, with QFNs it is not so obvious since the CTE-mismatch comes from the die--so die size and die attach are a big part of the equation.
So it depends on the stresses developed by the thermal expansion mismatch from the product of DNPxDCTExDT whether the thin SJs will survive long enough for reliability.
Werner



-----Original Message-----
From: Thayer, Wayne - IIW <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Thu, May 20, 2010 4:17 pm
Subject: [TN] Solder joint height

Should there be a spec for minimum solder joint height for leadless components?





An old paper from Werner (mid 90's, I believe) popped up on the Internet when I





queried this, and Werner has a statement in it that joints less than about 50





microns thick are basically all intermetallics, but that is not necessarily a





bad thing since the intermetallics are stronger than the solder (but more





brittle).










I figured since we often try to get additional height for BGA joints to improve





reliability, we should be concerned about QFNs and LCCs.










I grabbed a 1.5mil (37 micron) tungsten rod out of our cleanroom (used for





clearing clogged wirebond capillaries)and started seeing if I could get that





under my leadless components.  Couldn't get it under any of them, likewise with





the QFNs.










Checked Technet archives and didn't see an obvious thread, but maybe I didn't





have the correct search parameters--if you just enter "height" you get a couple





of thousand hits.










Wayne Thayer










This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be proprietary and are





intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are





addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender.





Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those





of the author and do not necessarily represent those of ITT Corporation. The





recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of





viruses. ITT accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted





by this e-mail.










______________________________________________________________________





This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.





For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>





______________________________________________________________________










---------------------------------------------------





Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0





To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> with following text in





the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet





To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to





[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)





To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to





[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>: SET Technet Digest





Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives





Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for





additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> or





847-615-7100 ext.2815





-----------------------------------------------------





______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2