TECHNET Archives

April 2010

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:33:19 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (302 lines)
Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 14, 2010, at 2:19 PM, Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>  
wrote:

> Hi Bob,
> Here is a copy of the announcement of Version 9 of the White Paper;  
> unfortunately, I only have it in English.
>
> EngelmaierAssociates, L.C. announces the release of the much  
> expanded version v.09 of thewidely acclaimed White Paper titled:
> "Recommendations for PCB FAB Notes andSpecifications in Printed  
> Circuit Board Drawings for SnPb and Lead-FreeSoldering Assemblies,  
> the Qualification of PCB Shops and Activities to AssureContinued  
> Quality."
> It has been argued, based on a lot ofevidence that the biggest  
> threat to electronic hardware reliability posed bythe change to lead- 
> free solders are problems with printed circuit boards. Asindicated  
> by the title, in this report recommendations are made  
> regardingappropriate specifications and ‘FAB Notes’ on drawings  
> for printed circuitboards (PCBs), general procedures to qualify PCB  
> shops and to assure they wouldbe producing PCBs of good quality, and 
>  testing procedures to verify quality andreliability.
> It provides the necessary additional material selection information  
> tosupplement the inadequate information given in the slash sheets in  
> IPC-4101. Itcontains recommended examples of ‘FAB Notes’—one  
> for SnPb solder assemblies andone for RoHS-compliant Pb-free solder  
> assemblies—serving as generalspecifications on PCB drawings, a basic 
>  questionnaire for new PCB shops to bequalified meant as a supplemen 
> t to IPC-1710, as well as recommendations forongoing activities to a 
> ssure that qualified PCB shops maintain the quality ofthe PCBs produ 
> ced by them.
> Nowhere can so much concentrated andup-to-date information be found  
> in one place. Version v.09 now includes 29specific FAB Notes, many  
> with sub-notes, for the specification of PCBs to beutilized in lead- 
> free solder assemblies.
> All the recommendations have been fullyresearched and referenced,  
> and are discussed in detail in the White Paper,which in version v.09  
> comprises 50 pages and 92 references.
> The cost of the report is $495.-; itwill be delivered as a pdf-file  
> upon receipt of a check or purchase order.Updates will be sent  
> automatically and at no additional cost.
> Werner Engelmaier
> Engelmaier Associates, L.C.
> Electronic Packaging,Interconnection and Reliability Consulting
> 7 Jasmine Run
> Ormond Beach, FL 32174 USA
> Phone: 386-437-8747, Cell: 386-316-5904
> E-mail: [log in to unmask], Website: www.engelmaier.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>
> To: Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>
> Cc: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wed, Apr 14, 2010 9:15 am
> Subject: Re: [TN] Contract PCB Design Services T&C
>
>
> Werner,
>
> Would love to have a copy of the white paper.  My designer is a  
> contractor in Brasil.  He's an expert at PCAD and it's subsequent  
> incarnations  , the latest being Altium.  His fab notes aren't the  
> greatest so I'd like to see how we can improve them since we have to  
> make sure they use Sn/Pb procedures as we refuse to go lead-free.
>
> Bob
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Apr 13, 2010, at 12:51 PM, Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>  
> wrote:
>
>> Peter, Greg & All,
>> It is precisely for these reasons that I developed the White Paper  
>> > "Recommendationsfor PCB FAB Notes and Specifications in Printed >  
>> Circuit Board Drawings for SnPband Lead-Free Soldering Assemblies,  
>> > the Qualification of PCB Shops andActivities to Assure Continued  
>> > Quality."
>> The OEMs no longer have any in-house expertise precisely at the  
>> time > the need it the most because of the demands of Pb-free  
>> assembly. > When sh.. hits the fan, as it invariably will, they  
>> blame the Fab > house the assembly house or both, when it is  
>> inadequately spec'ed > PCBs made according to an inadequate  
>> specification, against which > the FAB houses bid, that is the root  
>> cause of the problems.
>> Werner
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Gregg Owens <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Sent: Tue, Apr 13, 2010 12:00 pm
>> Subject: Re: [TN] Contract PCB Design Services T&C
>>
>>
>> Pete:
>>
>> Your "rant" could easily be extended to every area of PCBA >  
>> manufacturing. The
>> rise of PCBA assemblies houses in the 1980s are examples of how >  
>> management has
>> tried to save upfront costs only to pay more in the end with longer  
>> > lead times.
>> This is not to say assembly houses are "bad" but it transferred the  
>> > electronics
>> manufacturing process away from the very people who would be >  
>> installing and
>> using the PCBAs - the end users. This business model has created >  
>> lots more
>> finger pointing between end users and the board and assembly houses  
>> > because the
>> end users no longer retain the experience necessary to clearly >  
>> determine whether
>> the root cause of a problem is design or process related. Then this  
>> > century
>> throw in lead-free and you end up with lots of folks working very >  
>> hard in this
>> industry but with all too great ignorance of the materials and >  
>> processes they
>> are using, all the while trying to keep quarterly profits in a >  
>> positive
>> position. I will now get off my soap box.
>>
>> Gregg Owens
>> Technical Writer - Avionics
>> Space Exploration Technologies Corporation
>> (310) 363-6533
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Pete Houwen
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 7:19 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [TN] Contract PCB Design Services T&C
>>
>> Bob, I'm in a rather similar situation.  A company of 3000+, R&D >  
>> locations on 3
>> continents and 2 islands.  I am the sole remaining PCB designer.
>>
>> To answer your questions first:
>>
>> 1.  We have a set of company specific design standards, mostly to >  
>> make sure
>> the data we receive is compatible with MRP and CAM standards, and  
>> it > makes
>> it easier for me to pick up the "finished" job and, well, finish >  
>> it.  But we
>> don't
>> keep a standard agreement, as the services we require change based  
>> > on the
>> design.
>>
>> 2. If a company can not deliver what we have asked for, either >  
>> during or at
>> the end, they don't get paid.  In a situation such as yours, a mutual
>> agreement to terminate the effort, we would pay them for the part  
>> of > the
>> work we can use, whatever did meet parts of the agreement.  This has
>> happened before.
>>
>> now the rant:
>>
>> We laid off all the designers but me.  We send the work to China, >  
>> using
>> engineers with no PCB experience whatsoever, to do design and
>> documentation.  Their cost is 1/3 of ours.  It takes them 3x as  
>> long > to deliver
>> a design.  Between the time I spend getting them started and >  
>> correcting
>> after, I spend 1.5x what it would take to do the design myself.  To  
>> > Sr.
>> management, this is cost savings.  Lately, we have been contacting  
>> > one of
>> the designers we laid off.  We pay him almost what it cost when he  
>> was
>> employed here.  And again, add in my time, so we're about even  
>> now.  > That
>> works well, except that he has another full time job, so turn time  
>> > is longer.
>> And since I am stretched so thin, there have been errors - costly >  
>> errors, and
>> reduced manufacturability.
>>
>> Here's hoping the new "Undercover Boss" TV series starts opening >  
>> some eyes.
>>
>> Pete
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------
>> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
>> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following >  
>> text in
>> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
>> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
>> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
>> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
>> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
>> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
>> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 
>> >  for
>> additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]  
>> or
>> 847-615-7100 ext.2815
>> -----------------------------------------------------
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________  

>> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
>> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
>> ______________________________________________________________________  

>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------
>> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
>> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following >  
>> text in
>> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
>> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
>> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
>> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
>> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
>> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
>> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 
>> >  for
>> additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]  
>> or
>> 847-615-7100 ext.2815
>> -----------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________  

>> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
>> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
>> ______________________________________________________________________  

>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------
>> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
>> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following >  
>> text in
>> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
>> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail  
>> to [log in to unmask]> : SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
>> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask] 
>> > : SET Technet Digest
>> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
>> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 
>> >  for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] 
>> >  or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
>> -----------------------------------------------------
>>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following  
> text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask] 
> : SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask] 
> : SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 
>  for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] 
>  or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
>

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2