TECHNET Archives

March 2010

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Kane, Amol (349)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Kane, Amol (349)
Date:
Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:41:35 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (96 lines)
Dave,
This may worthwhile to try. Print solderpaste and dispense a lot of tacky flux on the site, over the printed solderpaste. Place component and send it thru reflow. We have had instances where we came out with a lot of (unwanted) flux voids when a lot of tacky flux was added during BGA rework.

Amol

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David D. Hillman
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 10:43 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Suggestions on Making BGA Voids

Hi gang! Ok, I have a fairly crazy request for suggestions on how to make 
BGA voids.  First here is the background - Dr. David Bernard (Dage), Dave 
Adams (Rockwell Collins)  and I are working on a collaborative project to 
investigate the thermal cycle solder joint integrity of BGA components. We 
are attempting to produce data which the IPC JSTD 001 committee can use to 
revise the 25% maximum void criteria. Despite public rumor, this current 
IPC JSTD 001 void requirement is based on actual IPC Class 3 field 
equipment  results submitted to the committee several years ago. However, 
BGAs have changed in both size, pitch and solderball diameter since the 
creation of the void criteria thus the reason for collaborative project. 
We have a test vehicle which contains BGAs at 0.5mm, 0.8mm and 1.0mm pitch 
with each having a corresponding larger solderball diameter. We have put 
uvias in the BGA pads to "create" voiding. Great plan, figured we had it 
made- however, after running the test vehicles thru a standard reflow 
process (this effort is focused on tin/lead right now) we find that we 
have an average void size in the range of 0-5%!  My production process 
folks are very proud of that result but it doesn't do our voiding 
investigation much good (you can imagine the look I got when I told them 
they didn't make enough voids greater than 25%).  I know that a number of 
the Technet community have tried to accomplish this voiding task with only 
mild success (i.e. Bev Christian, Martin Wickham, etc.). 

My Technet request is - do you have any suggestions on how to increase the 
solderball void size without causing a biased negative impact on the 
solder joint quality? I can obviously make some huge solderball voids 
(such as pouring Doug's Diet Mt. Dew on the test vehicles) but the overall 
quality of the solder joint would not be representative of the real world 
product.

Thanks in advance

Dave Hillman
Rockwell Collins
[log in to unmask]


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------



WARNING:  Export Control 
This document may contain technical data within the definition of the 
International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), and subject to the Export 
Control Laws of the U.S. Government.  Transfer of such data by any means to a 
foreign person, whether in the United States or abroad, without proper export 
authorization or other approval from the U.S. Department of State is 
prohibited. 
 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: 
This e-mail, and any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended 
recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential and 
protected from disclosure under the law. Any unauthorized review, use, 
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail, and delete/destroy 
all copies of the original message and attachments. 
Thank you.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2