TECHNET Archives

March 2010

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 12:14:44 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (74 lines)
In a previous life with a contract manufacturer that did a class 3
automotive, we routinely coated over no clean residues with few or any
issues.  I never felt comfortable with that however and am very glad to
be cleaning our no-clean presently.  You do wind up getting areas that
are quasi- coated with a CC & Flux -residue blend of some type.  I
suspect that perhaps that SR coatings may be more forgiving along this
line.  If I were a coating manufacturer however, I would contest any
claim of defective coating with the fact that you don't have "our CC" in
that failed spot(S). 

Rich Kraszewski

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ken Bloomquist
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 11:20 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Conformal Coat Over No-Clean Flux

We have a twelve leaded, through-hole component that has to be hand
soldered
on the circuit board. The assembly gets conformal coated with urethane.
We
would like to hand solder these twelve leads using no-clean and then
conformal coat the board. The component would be added as a final step
after
the assembly has first been cleaned.

Since this is not a "total no-clean" process do you see any issues
applying
conformal coat over these twelve no-clean solder joints?

Best regards,

KennyB


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
[log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2