TECHNET Archives

February 2010

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:13:29 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Thanks, Werner.  My curiosity is indeed satisfied.



 



That pretty much does it!



 



Leland



 



From: Werner Engelmaier [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 10:59 AM

To: [log in to unmask]; Leland Woodall; [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [TN] track lifting



 



Hi Leland,

The root cause is the much higher thermal expansion mismatch on cooling from reflow.

It comes from a number of negative factors coming into play:

(1) SAC solders are significantly stiffer (greater modulus of elasticity) than SnPb;



(2) SAC solder are significantly stronger (greater yield strength);

(3) SAC solders creep much slower (therefore provide no 'give');

(4) SAC solder have a Solidus of 217°C instead 183°C, thereby almost doubling the delta-T to the PCB glass transition T;

(5) SAC solders, because (1-3) become a mechanically significant member with a large CTE on top of the copper traces;

(6)  the PCB base materials in order to be RoHS-capable are typically phenolic-, not dicy-, cured and contain fillers—this can reduce the cohesive strength of the resin matrix (e.g., pad cratering);

(7) the higher T's tend to reduce the peel strength of the copper traces on the laminate;

(8) in many cases the cooling rates from reflow have remained the same as with SnPb [as I mentioned earlier, HP has mandated that cooling rates need to be reduced to 1.5°C/sec or lower) setting up significant thermal gradients, thermal expansion [of course with cooling, this should read 'contraction'] mismatches, and much higher stress levels than were possible with SnPb;

(9) most reflow ovens are not designed for achieving cooling rates of 1.5°C/sec or less; for anything but 10-zone ovens, additional cooling zones need to be added [at 1.5°C/sec you need a cooling section of about 100 cm, at 1.0°C/sec that becomes 150 cm];

(10) and there are likely to be other factors as well.

I think/hope your curiosity has been satsified.

Werner



 



 



-----Original Message-----

From: Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>

To: [log in to unmask]

Sent: Wed, Feb 3, 2010 9:57 am

Subject: Re: [TN] track lifting



Brian,



















Was the strain you mention below originate from the reflow process?  Was









it because of a thermal mismatch or an accelerated cooling rate?



















Just curious...



















Leland



















-----Original Message-----









From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> ] On Behalf Of Brian Chandler









Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 7:28 AM









To: [log in to unmask]









Subject: Re: [TN] track lifting



















We just conducted a study on acceptable strain levels for lead free









products. 









Our BGA test coupons showed this exact result from excess strain.



















---------------------------------------------------









Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0









To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text









in









the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet









To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to









[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)









To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to









[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest









Search the archives of previous posts at:









http://listserv.ipc.org/archives









Please visit IPC web site









http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional









information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100









ext.2815









-----------------------------------------------------



















---------------------------------------------------









Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0









To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in









the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet









To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 









[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)









To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 









[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest









Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives









Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for 









additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 









847-615-7100 ext.2815









-----------------------------------------------------










ATOM RSS1 RSS2