TECHNET Archives

February 2010

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:58:34 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (75 lines)
I remember a few years ago we had a problem with BGA voids and the two major causes were the use of Indium solder paste and possibly the higher humidity in the spring. We were always within specification and Indium gave us different stories and two different variations of the same past. I don't remember if it was No-Clean/OA or even PB-free. 

I do know that when we changed solder paste to Multicore, the problem disappeared.  
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David D. Hillman" <[log in to unmask]> 
To: [log in to unmask] 
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 10:42:57 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: [TN] Suggestions on Making BGA Voids 

Hi gang! Ok, I have a fairly crazy request for suggestions on how to make 
BGA voids.  First here is the background - Dr. David Bernard (Dage), Dave 
Adams (Rockwell Collins)  and I are working on a collaborative project to 
investigate the thermal cycle solder joint integrity of BGA components. We 
are attempting to produce data which the IPC JSTD 001 committee can use to 
revise the 25% maximum void criteria. Despite public rumor, this current 
IPC JSTD 001 void requirement is based on actual IPC Class 3 field 
equipment  results submitted to the committee several years ago. However, 
BGAs have changed in both size, pitch and solderball diameter since the 
creation of the void criteria thus the reason for collaborative project. 
We have a test vehicle which contains BGAs at 0.5mm, 0.8mm and 1.0mm pitch 
with each having a corresponding larger solderball diameter. We have put 
uvias in the BGA pads to "create" voiding. Great plan, figured we had it 
made- however, after running the test vehicles thru a standard reflow 
process (this effort is focused on tin/lead right now) we find that we 
have an average void size in the range of 0-5%!  My production process 
folks are very proud of that result but it doesn't do our voiding 
investigation much good (you can imagine the look I got when I told them 
they didn't make enough voids greater than 25%).  I know that a number of 
the Technet community have tried to accomplish this voiding task with only 
mild success (i.e. Bev Christian, Martin Wickham, etc.). 

My Technet request is - do you have any suggestions on how to increase the 
solderball void size without causing a biased negative impact on the 
solder joint quality? I can obviously make some huge solderball voids 
(such as pouring Doug's Diet Mt. Dew on the test vehicles) but the overall 
quality of the solder joint would not be representative of the real world 
product. 

Thanks in advance 

Dave Hillman 
Rockwell Collins 
[log in to unmask] 


______________________________________________________________________ 
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. 
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________ 

--------------------------------------------------- 
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in 
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet 
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) 
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest 
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives 
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815 
----------------------------------------------------- 

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2