TECHNET Archives

February 2010

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"David D. Hillman" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:28:04 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (207 lines)
Hi Bob - yes, using an inert atmosphere during the baking will 
significantly reduce the impact of surface oxidation for a pwb surface 
finish but the inert atmosphere won't change the formation and oxidation 
of the IMC. The oxidation of IMC happens very quickly (within 20 minutes 
once exposed to air) so even if an inert atmosphere prevented oxidation of 
the IMC during baking, the IMC will oxidize during storage if it reaches 
the surface. The big issue is that the baking process is the growth assist 
mechanism for the IMC - if you don't bake, the probability of the IMC 
becoming thick enough to reach a surface and become oxidized is low. As 
for using inert atmosphere in the automated processes, many folks do 
utilize nitrogen in that capacity. However, using an inert atmosphere 
within a process does increase the process consumables costs and an inert 
atmosphere isn't always necessary to produce the required solder joint 
quality. We utilize inert atmospheres in our reflow ovens for assemblies 
that have 0201s, QFNs, CSPs but have determined that QFPs, TSOPs, 0603s, 
etc do not require an inert atmosphere reflow environment, providing they 
have good solderability, to form acceptable solder joint quality. An inert 
atmosphere is one portion of the recipe involving flux type/activity, flux 
residue quantity/removability, component wettability and process cost - 
depending on which process attribute is more important to a user, 
different process priority choices are made.

Dave



Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]> 
Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
02/17/2010 06:44 PM
Please respond to
Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>


To
[log in to unmask]
cc

Subject
Re: [TN] IMC growth on ImSn






Dave,

Why not bake boards in an inert nitrogen atmosphere? 

And while we're on the subject, why isn't it a requirement that all 
automated soldering (wave and reflow) done under a nitrogen atmosphere? 
What's the cost difference?  Isn't it worth it as it reduces the need for 
a flux which is highly activated and which is harder to remove after 
soldering?

Bob Landman
H&L Instruments, LLC 

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David D. Hillman
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 8:47 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] IMC growth on ImSn

Hi Jowan! Yes, you may see a difference is the ImSn degradation depending 
on which order you conduct your baking process. The ImSn surface finish 
has two degradation mechanisms - oxidation of the Sn on the ImSn surface 
and diffusion of the copper into the tin creating a copper/tin 
intermetallic (IMC) which has really bad solderability characteristics 
once it becomes oxidized. Diffusion is a time/temperature controlled 
process so if you "bake and store" the pwbs, you are effectively assisting 
the creation of the IMC, its oxidation and degrading the pwbs much faster 
than if you " store and bake". ImAg and ENIG are much more robust in terms 
of oxidation and IMC issues in comparison to ImSn but the same processes 
are going to occur just on a different time scale and with different IMC 
phase reactions (i.e. oxidized Ni based IMCs are not any fun to solder 
either). The good news is that the many of the pwb surface finishes on the 
market today have 12 months of shelf life when stored in reasonable 
temperature/humidity controlled conditions. The IPC-1601 committee is 
working on a document that addresses your question.

Dave Hillman
Rockwell Collins
[log in to unmask]




"Iven, Jowan" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
02/17/2010 02:11 AM
Please respond to
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; Please respond to "Iven, Jowan" 
<[log in to unmask]>


To
[log in to unmask]
cc

Subject
[TN] IMC growth on ImSn






Hello all,

Baking boards before SMT assembly  is very common.
Is there a difference between "baking and then storing the board for 6
months" and "storing the board for 6 months and then baking before
assembly" ?
Does the IMC grow faster on boards with ImSn finish after baking?
I'm especially talking about ImSn but I'm also interested in the effect
of baking on other finishes like ImAg and Enig.

Storage would be in a dry shield bag with silicagel or a dry cabinet.

Any suggestions are welcome.


Jowan Iven 



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 

for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 

847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2