TECHNET Archives

February 2010

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:27:28 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (92 lines)
Agreed.  1 or 3 but no other.   

Rich Stadem posted this helpful advice on reballing BGAs:

-----Original Message-----
From: Leadfree [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stadem, Richard D.
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 11:34 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [LF] Quality/Reliability of 're-balled' BGA devices

I have seen literally hundreds of thousands of BGAs reballed many I performed myself, with both convection methods as well as using a proprietary laser ball attachment process. I was the engineer for these processes either at companies I have worked for in the past, or with companies I currently work for (I am a consulting engineer for several companies as well as being an employee of GD).
If done properly using a controlled method, such as the paper pre-forms from Six Sigma/Winslow Automation or with solder spheres poured into the appropriate stencil, in conjunction with a set convection reflow profile, along with an automated ball removal method (not a hot-air vacuum method, however) I have never seen a BGA fail prematurely because it was re-balled. I have seen many fail because the process was not controlled, however. When critical steps such as pre-bake are skipped the components will not survive, or their reliability will be reduced.
Use of the wrong fluxes, improper rework methods, improper reflow profiles, etc. can also cause issues.
I have twice captured field reliability data from BGAs that were re-balled, both with BGAs reballed using convection and with those re-balled using laser. Both were instances where a number of BGAs needed to be removed, re-balled, and replaced. The first instance was to put the parts on a different PWB, the second instance was to change the alloy from Sn63 to Kester K100DL, but not to meet RoHS requirements. 

In both instances, the re-balled BGAs had longer mean times before failure than the BGAs that were never re-balled. While I am not absolutely certain as to why, I believe it is because the SJs on the re-balled BGAs were superior due to the fact that new balls were added to the BGA pads that had been essentially pre-tinned during the removal of the original solder balls and the site prep performed on the BGA pads.

While working for Analog Technologies in Burnsville, Mn, we developed a laser soldering machine as well as a process for performing laser ball attachment using a proprietary oxygen evacuation chemical process (read about it here www.analog-tech.com). This process removes all oxygen from around the ball during the laser soldering (no nitrogen is used) leaving behind perfectly pristine solder balls with no wetting issues. This process also does not heat up the BGA, CSP, or flip chip itself, because all of the energy is focused on the solder ball and the pad. This eliminates two of the four heat cycles necessary to remove a BGA, strip the old solder, reball, and reattach it.
Analog has been performing BGA original ball attachment and re-balling for several years now, and we have not seen any, repeat, no issues with BGAs that were either reballed or attached with laser or controlled convection processes.

BGA rework and reballing is generally a safe procedure, but only as long as the process is qualified and controlled. All too often I have been called in to look at rework processes where it is done with a different method each time depending on which operator did it, what day of the week it was done, and how the constellations were aligned. The results were to be expected including delamination of the die, delamination of the BGA substrate, popcorning, and other issues.

====================

Bob Landman
H&L 

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Joyce Koo
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 6:31 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Pre-Tinned BGA?

(3) And (1). But not the other. (3) required nothing to be done on the assembly level.  All the rel data are valid.  (1) may need reduced rel qual.  The others, as material change, most of the mil or hi rel house need full qual (shake, drop all the nine yard).  It would cost around 30 to 50k plus risk budget (depend upon how complicated is your assembly) and 3 month delay.  At least it use to be. My ancient 1.8 cents. 
--------------------------
Sent using BlackBerry


----- Original Message -----
From: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Mon Feb 15 17:49:57 2010
Subject: [TN] Pre-Tinned BGA?

Hello All,
 I had a question to see if anyone has tried anything different. Most of our customers are some how related to the military. So we have one product that the customer just found out was a PB-Free device. They want us to "pre-tin" the spheres. Now I have tried several process for forward and backward processes. None of them include re-tinning of a BGA Device. We do re-tin other leaded and some non leaded devices. So below are the three options I have recommended but still have reliability concerns as the end product is to be coated with Paralyne.
1. Re- Ball to PB/SN
2. Sue a selective rework machine and place pate with isolated heat if the substraight could handle.
3. Purchase the component in PB/SN material 4. Reflow the product with slightly higher temps (5c per 10 zones) once out of over and cold to room temp underfil the device.

Again if anyone has any more ideas I am game!!


Carl Ray
Lewisburg TN 37091

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2