IPC-600-6012 Archives

February 2010

IPC-600-6012@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Roberto Tulman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Combined Forum of D-33a and 7-31a Subcommittees)
Date:
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:56:29 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (57 lines)
Dear all

 

I'd like to have your opinion about the interpretation of the IPC-6012.

A multilayer is sequentially built and has a (pre-drilled and plated)
core for layers 1 and 2. 

This core is not laser drillable and can be only mechanically drilled.

 

Table 3-3 applies to Through Holes, Blind and Buried Vias > 2 layers.

What about blind vias equal to 2 layers? (Such as layer 1-2 made of a
drilled and plated core). Table 3-5 applies to a 2 layers core, but is
defined as a buried core only.

 

Note 1 to table 3-3 : "Does not apply to microvias. Blind vias have
greater than 1:1 aspect ratio ."

Note 1 to table 3-4 :" Microvias are defined as less or equal to 1:1
aspect ratio ( excludes mechanical drill),  or mechanically drilled <_
0.15 mm."

 

Which standard shall apply to blind vias that have an aspect ratio less
or equal to 1:1 -  for example layer 1-2 made of  a drilled and plated
core : 

Case A : 0.25 mm thick core with 0.25 mm mechanically drilled holes .

Case B : 0.25 mm thick core with 0.20 mm mechanically drilled holes.

 

Just to compare: what is your opinion  for the copper needed for a
double sided PCB with filled vias

 

Regards,

Roberto Tulman, CTO

Eltek


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2