Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | (Combined Forum of D-33a and 7-31a Subcommittees) |
Date: | Mon, 1 Feb 2010 08:42:26 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I would at very least view it as a process indicator. Given that the
sample is thermally stressed, the design and/or materials of the PWB may
well be contributing factors. The fabricator may, therefore, not be the
only place I need to look for root cause.
If I found this in an area with closely spaced through-vias, I would
certainly regard it as a CAF risk, and I would not accept it.
Fritz Byle
Astronautics Corp. of America
-----Original Message-----
From: IPC-600-6012 [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jose A
Rios
Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 6:43 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [IPC-600-6012] Bundle Crack in Microsection
i'd be curious to know from other oem's whether they reject for this
condition.
i got the impression in phoenix that not all oem's reject for this.
Joey Rios
PWB & Process Quality Eng'r
Endicott Interconnect Technologies
1093 Clark St.
Endicott, NY 13760
Office: 607-755-5896
Denise Chevalier <[log in to unmask]>
Sent by: IPC-600-6012 <[log in to unmask]>
01/29/2010 09:15 AM
Please respond to
"(Combined Forum of D-33a and 7-31a Subcommittees)"
<[log in to unmask]>
To
[log in to unmask]
cc
Subject
Re: [IPC-600-6012] Bundle Crack in Microsection
Historically this has been termed as measling or crazing and has been
evaluated from the surface not from micro sections, see section 2.3 of
IPC-600 for photos and criteria. Lately we have had some customers that
are rejecting for this condition when seen in the sections (terming as
bundle cracks). Think that an open discussion would be of value - would
also like to see if there is any data out there that would contradict
the current requirement.
Denise
-----Original Message-----
From: IPC-600-6012 [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jose A
Rios
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 9:09 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [IPC-600-6012] Bundle Crack in Microsection
isnt this crazing (or a cousin of...) ??
i'd be interested to see the area of interest at higher mag, to see if
the
crack goes thru an actual glass fiber or not.
i've seen cracks induced by sectioning (aggressive grinding/polishing)
where individual glass bundles are cut in half.
as to possible caf paths, couldnt measles and/or crazes act as such, yet
neither one is rejectable.
Joey Rios
PWB & Process Quality Eng'r
Endicott Interconnect Technologies
1093 Clark St.
Endicott, NY 13760
Office: 607-755-5896
John Perry <[log in to unmask]>
Sent by: IPC-600-6012 <[log in to unmask]>
01/28/2010 07:35 PM
Please respond to
"(Combined Forum of D-33a and 7-31a Subcommittees)"
<[log in to unmask]>
To
[log in to unmask]
cc
Subject
[IPC-600-6012] Bundle Crack in Microsection
Hi Everyone,
We've got a request for feedback on the anomaly in the attached .ppt
file
which was detected in one bundle of glass in a coupon. This is in the
center of the board stack, which is a 24 layer construction. Since it
is
in the core material it may be related to glass non-wetting of the resin
or poor glass treatment.
I'd also like to know if this is something we can consider developing
criteria for in the next generation of IPC-6012/A-600 when we meet in
Las
Vegas in a couple months.
Regards,
John Perry
Technical Project Manager
IPC - Association Connecting Electronics Industries(r)
3000 Lakeside Drive # 309S
Bannockburn, IL 60015-1249 USA
+1 847-597-2818 (tel)
+1 847-615-7105 (fax)
+1 847-615-7100 (Main)
[log in to unmask]
www.ipc.org
|
|
|