TECHNET Archives

January 2010

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"David D. Hillman" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Thu, 7 Jan 2010 07:15:33 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (83 lines)
Hi Gregg!  Just a couple of comments. Ultrasonic cleaning was viewed very 
skeptically for many years as there was a concern that the ultrasonic 
energy could cause damage at a component die/wirebond level for some 
component constructions/configurations. A couple of researchers in the UK 
(Richards/Foote were the authors I think - I have their report in the my 
archives somewhere) did some foundation investigation demonstrating that 
ultrasonic cleaning using 40 KHz transducers did not cause component 
damage. And there has been additional process investigation since that 
initial publication. You might check the IPC test methods and IPC cleaning 
guideline standards for additional information. 

Dave Hillman
Rockwell Collins
[log in to unmask]




Gregg Owens <[log in to unmask]> 
Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
01/07/2010 01:28 AM
Please respond to
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; Please respond to
Gregg Owens <[log in to unmask]>


To
[log in to unmask]
cc

Subject
[TN] ULtrasonic Cleaning of PCBAs






Dear Technetters:

I have been posed a question that I don?t have much experience with other 
than general knowledge. It there an ultrasonic cleaner system/setting 
available that can clean printed circuit assemblies (yes will electronic 
components)?  With some pending designs there is a concern that our board 
houses will be able to sufficiently clean (deflux) under bottom only 
components/BGA style components. I know from the standards that ultrasonic 
cleaning is typically limited to bare boards so as to not damage internal 
interconnections/wire bonds. But I am wondering if there is a low setting 
available to agitate the solution while not destroy/damage components?

Your thoughts are most appreciated.

Gregg Owens
Technical Writer - Avionics
Space Exploration Technologies Corporation
1 Rocket Road | Hawthorne | CA | 90250
[log in to unmask]

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2