TECHNET Archives

January 2010

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Wed, 6 Jan 2010 14:59:32 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Steve,



What if "the proprietary magic" wasn't magical enough to form an initial/sufficient layer of intermetallics, so the bond would have virtually no mechanical strength? Did you see whether any metallurgical bond was formed?



Regards,



Vladimir

SENTEC

11 Canadian Road, Unit 7.

Scarborough, ON M1R 5G1

Tel: (416) 899-1882

Fax: (905) 882-8812

www.sentec.ca



-----Original Message-----

From: Steve Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Date:         Wed, 6 Jan 2010 08:50:49 

To: <[log in to unmask]>

Subject: Re: [TN] Pull strength of thermosonic wire bondable gold



Hi Steve et al,

Unfortunately this is not as easy as it sounds. First the lower pull

strengths are not necessarily a failure- they are just not as good. This was

an experiment designed between ourselves and our customer. The initial

problem is we have a .0032 wide flying lead ( about 150 of them) with no

kapton support. A chip/die is "compression bonded" onto the lead - from what

I can gather it is a combination of heat/pressure/ultrasonic and some kind

of proprietary magic. The reason we went to the lower nickel is because the

leads being so fragile they often crack during the process so we tried the

lower nickel to alleviate this issue. With the lower nickel pull is approx.

5-7 grams. With the higher nickel 9-11 grams. There is a gold bump on the

die and when the failure happens the gold bump separates from the lead with

no damage to the gold bump. At present this is as much as I know. Thanks for

the input so far. Steve Kelly



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steven Creswick

Sent: January-05-10 6:14 PM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [TN] Pull strength of thermosonic wire bondable gold



Steve,



If you can send me the data sets in an Excel format, I can provide you with

some insight based on magnitude and grouping by Weibull plot.  



If there is a big mix of failure modes, this interpretation will be pretty

generic.  



Its free input, however   :-)



Just send it direct.



Steve C



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steve Kelly

Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 4:17 PM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: [TN] Pull strength of thermosonic wire bondable gold



Hi All,



I have a wire bond question to the wire bond gurus who have helped me out a

lot in the past. Made 2 versions of a flex circuit - only varied the nickel

thickness. Application is thermosonic gold wire bonding.



Flex circuit lead is .0032 wide - version 1 - nickel is 150 microinches -

soft gold is 50 microinches- pull strength is X



                                                        Version 2 - nickel

is 40 microinches - soft gold is 50 microinches - pull strength is approx.

½X  of version 1-



Is this what I should expect?







Regards Steve Kelly







Steve Kelly (PLEASE NOTE NEW E-MAIL ADDRESS)



(416) 750-8433 (work)



(416) 750-0016 (fax)



(416) 577-8433 (cell)









---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet

To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)

To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16

for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or

847-615-7100 ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------



---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet

To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)

To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16

for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or

847-615-7100 ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------



---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet

To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)

To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------




ATOM RSS1 RSS2