TECHNET Archives

December 2009

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"David D. Hillman" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:00:13 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (311 lines)
Hi Chris - a SEM analysis, with the correct standards and detector setup, 
can see 0.2% Co but you would be better off using a Auger or SIMS analysis 
for looking at a trace element in thin surface finish.

Dave Hillman
Rockwell Collins
[log in to unmask]




Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]> 
Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
12/01/2009 09:22 AM
Please respond to
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; Please respond to
Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>


To
[log in to unmask]
cc

Subject
Re: [TN] IAu hardness






O.K.  We gave-up on the nano-identation altogether.
So, w.r.t. contact areas, if we found no Cobalt by SEM-EDS, what are the 
chances of hard gold?
Is 0.2% Co not detectable?  Or is it maybe just AuNi?  We did get Ni.
Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Chris Mahanna
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 9:55 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] IAu hardness

Inge et al.
Yes, I know the whole project seems a little strange.  So here is a little 
more background:  It is not uncommon for us to be asked to 
characterize/verify ENIG and hard gold on the same board (for the obvious 
reasons).  There must be 7 different ways to do that.
But, if I need to verify 500nm of AuCo over Ni to be 170 Knoop, I figure 
we need nano indent. At the same minimum job charge, I can get some 
numbers from the IAu.  If they are softer, voila!, I've 
verified/quantified that two processes were used.

Unfortunately, I'm not sure that I even got good numbers for the 500nm of 
AuCo.

Can you help with your conversion below?  5g-force/cm^2 = 0.0005 MPa? => 
approx. 0.00005 HV  ???

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Hernefjord Ingemar
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 3:40 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] IAu hardness

The micro/nano hardness is dependent of the nucleus growth > morphology. 
As far as I remember, there are three main types of grains: flakes, 
smoothy and powdered. These give various hardness. The size of the grains 
and the crystal directions also give variations in the hardness, as well 
as the thickness. Small bath contaminations, like AuCN can add further 
hardness. It's interesting to see that someone asks for the hardness of 
IG, because we have never succeeded to measure such thin gold platings. If 
you measure thicker gold, you are not so dependent of what I said above. 
So, for thicker films we use the following data:

5 grams= 215 HV
10grams= 220 HV
20grams= 200 HV
40grams= 220 HV
60grams= 223 HV
80grams= 225 HV
100gram= 225 HV

Inge

 

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Anil kher
Sent: tisdag 3 november 2009 07:33
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] IAu hardness

By pure chemistry of deposit - IAu should be 60 to 70 knoop microhardness

However since deposit is 0.05 um you would measure the underneath NiP 
hardness which is in 950Hv range.

Electrolytic Gold / Cobalt 0.2% should be 170 knoop. Electrolytic Nickel 
pure below Gold is 300 Hv.

Anil Kher



-----Original Message-----
From: Vladimir Igoshev [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 09:03
Subject: Re: IAu hardness

Chris,

In that particular case the surface roughness does matter a lot. Ideally, 
an indenter should come at 90 degree to the surface and it wouldn't be the 
case particularly for ENIG with its "nodding structure".

In addition, as I said before you can not compare the numbers as (in case 
of
ENIG) the reading most probably will be affected by residual stresses.

I'm not aware of a "typical" number for ENIG. A number of years ago I 
tried to measure it at different loads but don't remember what the 
readings were.

Honestly, I wouldn't use nanohardness (great technique but for different
tasks) in your particular case.

Regards,

Vladimir
SENTEC
SENTEC
11 Canadian Road, Unit 7.
Scarborough, ON M1R 5G1
Tel: (416) 899-1882
Fax: (905) 882-8812
www.sentec.ca


-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>
Date:         Mon, 2 Nov 2009 22:12:04 
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [TN] IAu hardness

Vladimir,
Indeed nano.  Both platings were tested with the exact same protocol:
Berkovich geometry, 1mN max load.  They are reporting penetration depth in 
nM.  The lab complained about the surface being too rough.  Might the IAu 
be un-uniform and the indenter is getting ahold of some Ni?  XRF with 4mil 
collimator doesn't show anything odd.  Saw some mudcracks via SEM on a 
"related" sample.

Or, should we just punt and say that comparisons can't be made?   If so,
does anyone know what numbers you typically get from ENIG? 

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 9:34 PM
To: TechNet E-Mail Forum; Chris Mahanna
Subject: Re: [TN] IAu hardness

Hi Chris,

Are you sure you are talking about nanohardness and not microhardness?

If it's nanohardness, then the measured values are completely different 
from a common (microhardness) method due to the nature of nanohardness 
measurements.

Secondly (and even more important) on a plated sample (and particularly 
like ENIG with extremely thin layer of Au) the nanohardness readings will 
depend on the indentation load (read depth of penetration).

In general, you can not draw a direct comparison between nanohardness 
measurements done on a thick (your hard gold case) and extremely thin 
(ENIG
case) plating.

Regards,

Vladimir
------Original Message------
From: Chris Mahanna
Sender: TechNet
To: [log in to unmask]
ReplyTo: TechNet E-Mail Forum
ReplyTo: Chris Mahanna
Sent: Nov 2, 2009 21:17
Subject: [TN] IAu hardness

Please help a simple EE.

From bare printed boards we are receiving nano-identation (hardness) 
values for hard (I assume Cobalt) gold in the 3000 MPa range.  Quick and 
dirty conversion yields ~300 Knoop/Vickers; right?
That sounds reasonable.

BUT, we're getting 6500 MPA for the ENIG.  Is this even possible?  Does 
anyone know if it is an indication of poor IAu?  Or maybe a poor 
nano-indentation tester?

Thanks,
Chris


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To 
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the 
BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or 
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per 
day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives 
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------



SENTEC
11 Canadian Road, Unit 7.
Scarborough, ON M1R 5G1
Tel: (416) 899-1882
Fax: (905) 882-8812
www.sentec.ca

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To 
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the 
BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or 
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per 
day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives 
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To 
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the 
BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or 
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET 
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: 
send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the archives of 
previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web 
site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional 
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To 
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the 
BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or 
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET 
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: 
send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the archives of 
previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web 
site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional 
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To 
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the 
BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or 
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET 
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: 
send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the archives of 
previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web 
site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional 
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2