TECHNET Archives

December 2009

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Inge <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:43:13 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (83 lines)
Graham,

#1. Correct. There must be absolutely no air gap! The cable is produced in a 
way, that the copper tube is pressed on the dielectric. Any sign of air gap 
means a risk that the dielectric will move on inside of the tube.  I have 
been working with semirigid cables for many years, and I've seen 
unbelievable things. In one case, we could 'pour' the dielectric out of the 
tube by holding the straight part vertically and knock on the copper!

#2. Depends on the frequency and the requirements for a clean signal or 
pulse. Normally, one mil is not a problem, BUT, in principle, with an air 
gap, you get a DISCONTINUITY, which can cause reflected signals, deformed 
pulse form and spurioses. I can't tell you what the breakpoint is, depends 
on the cable properties, the speed of the signal, rise/fall and such things.

If you have no microwave gure at hand, I can help you.

/Inge


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Graham Collins" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 12:43 PM
Subject: [TN] Semi-Rigid coax cables


A question for the TechNet cable gurus.  We are putting together some
semi-rigid coax cables and as this is new ground for me I'm not clear on
some of the inspection criteria.  IPC/WHMA-A-620 is helpful, but
expresses things in absolutes.  In particular, two things are being
questioned:

1) Air gap between dielectric and cable shield is not allowed.
Figure 13-62 shows it.  But how extreme is that "not allowed"?  Under
magnification there can easily be a gap that is not substantial, and is
not visible to the naked eye.  What sort of magnification should we be
using?
2) Dielectric below flush with the connector face - again there is
no stated wiggle room on this.  Any tips on arriving at a reasonable
compromise?  If I can see a .001" gap do I reject it?

regards,

Graham Collins
Halifax Production Engineering
(902) 873-2000 ext. 6215

This message and any attachments are solely for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
information that is privileged or confidential or controlled technical
data that is subject to the laws of Canada or the United States. If you
are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, use or distribution of
the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail
and immediately delete this message and any attachments.



---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2