TECHNET Archives

December 2009

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"David D. Hillman" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Tue, 1 Dec 2009 07:08:13 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (247 lines)
Hi Chris!  Part of the background Doug listed was ".......certain design 
engineers who absolutely, positively believe that every ball on a BGA must 
be coated with conformal coating......" and unfortunately these same 
design engineers also believe that either  (a) only a conformal coating 
material stops humidity and/or (b) an underfill material costs too much 
and takes too much time to apply to the BGA.  We do successfully use 
underfill in a number of applications where it is needed for solder joint 
integrity purposes. However, there are times when a lack of understanding 
of a material's characteristics and its application purpose seem to 
befuddle a design team's actions. Except for specific use environment 
applications, it is not necessary to coat every individual solderball on a 
BGA or CSP - the standard process of applying conformal coating to a 
printed circuit assembly is quite adequate for many, many use 
environments.  It is amazing how applying the laws of physics and 
conducting a bit of testing can demonstrate the "bigger the glob, the 
better the job" theory isn't advisable.

Dave



Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]> 
Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
11/30/2009 09:04 PM
Please respond to
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; Please respond to
Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>


To
[log in to unmask]
cc

Subject
Re: [TN] BGAs & Conformal Coating






Hey Doug and Dave,
out of curiosity-
So why not use an underfill material as the coating?  Do you not trust the 
electrical properties of the underfill, or is it a processing issue (e.g. 
wetting,voids...)?

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Douglas Pauls
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 11:52 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] BGAs & Conformal Coating

Thank you Steve for posting the pictures.  Here are the links.
 
http://stevezeva.homestead.com/files/deformed_Balls.jpg
 
http://stevezeva.homestead.com/files/Squished_Ball_1.jpg
 
http://stevezeva.homestead.com/files/Squished_Ball_2.jpg

To give a little background, we have certain design engineers who 
absolutely, positively believe that every ball on a BGA must be coated 
with conformal coating or it will fail in humidity.  They put silly notes 
on the engineering drawing to this effect, resulting in conformal coating 
being used like an underfill or a potting material.  Dave Hillman and I 
did an internal study this last year to demonstrate the effects.  We 
forceably filled the area under the BGAs with conformal coating, one a 
popular solvent based acrylic, the other a water based acrylic urethane. 
We left the material come to a tack free condition, fully cured the 
material, and then put it through thermal cycling, monitoring resistance. 
The cycle was -55C to +125C, 15 min dwells at either extreme, 8-10C/min 
ramp rates.  The test ran for a little over 2100 cycles.  The solvent 
based acrylic had a 73% failure rate by the end of the test.  The water 
based acrylic urethane had none.  The pictures are all of the solvent 
based acrylic, which has a higher CTE than the acrylic-urethane.  We 
tested BGAs, QFPs, a couple of QFNs, and some SOICs.  The only significant 

failures were for the BGAs.  Can't really say much more than this.

Doug Pauls
Rockwell Collins



"Steve Gregory" <[log in to unmask]> 
11/30/2009 07:33 AM

To
"'TechNet E-Mail Forum'" <[log in to unmask]>, <[log in to unmask]>
cc

Subject
RE: [TN] BGAs & Conformal Coating






Hi Doug!

Send them here: [log in to unmask]

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Douglas Pauls
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 8:29 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] BGAs & Conformal Coating

Good morning Juan,
I suspect that Xilinx wants you do do a thermal cycle study on solder 
joint reliability when conformal coating gets under the BGA.  The stresses 


brought about by a mismatches in the coefficient of thermal expansion 
(CTE) can rip a BGA off the board and can severely deform the balls. 
Hillman and I did such a study here a few years ago.  I can share a few 
pictures of what happens, if Steve Gregory would be kind enough to forward 


his present e-mail address for the photos.  Not sure I have the right one.

Doug Pauls



"Juan T. Marugán" <[log in to unmask]> 
Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
11/26/2009 11:53 AM
Please respond to
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; Please respond to
"Juan T. Marugán" <[log in to unmask]>


To
[log in to unmask]
cc

Subject
[TN] BGAs & Conformal Coating






Hi,

I've read in a Xilinx guide that: "Xilinx has no experience or reliability 


data on 
flip-chip BGA packages on board after exposure to conformal coating. It is 



recommended that the end-user should characterize the board level 
reliability 
performance of Xilinx packages before production use."

Does anybody know any infomation or study related with this topic?

Thank you.

Juan T. Marugán
Indra Sistemas SA
Espańa

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 


for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 


847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------



---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2