TECHNET Archives

December 2009

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Blair Hogg <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Blair Hogg <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 2 Dec 2009 08:17:33 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Hi Technetters,

I've looked at machine specifications that quote placement rates per IPC9850. 
How do these rates compare with actual throughput? If a machine quotes 
20,000 CPH per IPC 9850, and a PCBA has 2000 components, should the 
machine be able to produce a board every 6 minutes? 

Obviously, nozzle changes will reduce throughput, as will layout and de-
optimziation of the placement (layout, feeder positioning, etc.). 

Has anyone looked at actual performance vs. quoted performance to get a 
real world estimation?

Thanks,

Blair

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2