TECHNET Archives

December 2009

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Eric CHRISTISON <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Eric CHRISTISON <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:13:08 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (135 lines)
I agree with you Mike.

Most of this stuff is just cut and paste and we get our supplers to do 
the donkey work and fill out their part of the form for us. I used to 
think that no one read them either and was seriously considering 
slipping a gramme of plutonium into a materials declaration just to see 
if anyone said anything when our customer did actually comment on a few 
details.

That said it is mind crushingly boring. In the past I've regarded it a 
bit like toothache, if you can ignore it for long enough it seems to go 
away. But that's not a very professional approach.

Regards,



Mike Fenner wrote:
> Hi Inge
>
> We occasionally receive long lists of chemicals and substances which we have
> to certify are not present in our products or our manufacturing. On first
> sight they look like an impossible task.
> On investigation these lists are invariably repetitions of all the
> substances that have been subject of legislation banning them. They are
> usually grouped according to the legislation topics and in chronological
> order of the legislation. Amongst these would be ROHS.
> These look very difficult on first sight, but [for us anyway] are not that
> onerous as it is easy to see that about 98% of the stuff does not apply.
> Likely REACH will affect this as it is getting into everything in the
> compliance/EHS zone.
>
>
> Specifically on ROHS: Certain aerospace and high rel defence companies do
> have continuing concerns about Pb-free, and require strict
> analysis/certification. Their concerns are the opposite of most other
> people: make sure that no damaging Pb-free [finishes] creep in to their
> facility. So as we, in common with most larger solder companies, routinely
> give a solder analysis and RoHS statement with every shipment this actually
> is not really a problem.
>
> I am also aware that occasionally companies do have difficult requirements
> on component values. These seem be those wanting to get very tight
> accuracies on resistor values, but for some reason can't use hybrid thick
> film, usually size/complexity expense, sometimes expense. (For those few who
> possibly don't know: hybrid thick film resistors can be
> accurately/individually laser trimmed).
>
> Maybe Boeing falls into this category.
>
> Hope this perspective helps.
>
>
> Regards
>  
>  
> Mike
>
> Mike Fenner, Technical Manager
> Indium Corporation
> Europe 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Inge
> Sent: Saturday, December 12, 2009 9:16 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [TN] RoHS burden
>
> Hi all,
> have not had time to take part of the discussions for a while. Am consulting
>
> at another company. They needed help with doing analysis of components. 
> Boeing is incorporated. I got a list of forbidden materials from them. Not 
> many can cope with Boeing's requirements. Only a few in whole Europe! Now, 
> I've a question. Has anyone of you been involved in such tough demands, 
> namely this one...not only they call for checking the finish of every 
> component type, but all values (!!) within each component family. That 
> means, that one sample from EVERY resistor value must be analyzed and 
> reported to Boeing.  An incredible job list.  Does this make sense?
> /Inge 
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
> for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ***This email, its content, and any files transmitted with it, are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by return and delete the material from any computer. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
>
> Messages sent via this medium may be subjected to delays, non-delivery, and unauthorized alteration. This email has been prepared using information believed by the author to be reliable and accurate, but Indium Corporation makes no warranty as to accuracy or completeness. Indium Corporation does not accept responsibility for changes made to this email after is was sent. Any opinions or recommendations expressed herein are solely those of the author. They may be subject to change without notice.***
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>   

-- 
Eric Christison Msc
Mechanical Engineer
Consumer & Micro group
Imaging Division

STMicroelectronics (R&D) Ltd
33 Pinkhill
Edinburgh EH12 7BF
United Kingdom

Tel:	+44 (0)131 336 6165
Fax:	+ 44 (0)131 336 6001

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2