May be not. Isn't MIL started requirement for key components req to be "in house"? Need another 10 years to see the day light.
--------------------------
Sent using BlackBerry
----- Original Message -----
From: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sat Dec 12 11:22:10 2009
Subject: Re: [TN] APEX and Fall Meeting - going forward
Is it reasonable to "Standards Development" and the opportunities derived from the held copy rights can be profitable?
Is it reasonable to expect that integrating the opportunity for industry suppliers to generate wealth at trade shows with a conference for meetings to develop standards would be profitable? Perhaps Bev and Werner are discussing two symptoms of an condition. Electronics manufacturing in North America a shrinking.
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Werner Engelmaier
Sent: Saturday, December 12, 2009 9:22 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] APEX and Fall Meeting - going forward
Hi Bev,
I have been doing this juggling act for years. None of this is made any easier with the conference program sometimes listing the documents worked on, but other times only the committee or document number.
Giving the fact that IPC has been loosing money for at least the last two meetings, there is no way IPC will extend the committee days [what am I saying, in the past, some committees actually started on Saturday before the official start]. This of course is difficult this year, since we start right after Easter and people would have to be away from home over Easter.
In the past, many committee meetings actually did start as early as 7:30, no problem there. Maybe schedule some committees during the Keynote Session. Later than 5/evening, while it can be done may not be very good—people do get punchy and tired.
Things started to really change about 10 years ago, when with the advent of the exhibits, committee work was no longer the sole focus of the IPC meetings.
Werner
-----Original Message-----
From: Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Fri, Dec 11, 2009 8:32 pm
Subject: [TN] APEX and Fall Meeting - going forward
Technetters,
I don't know about you, but for me three days for the committee meetings is
too tight.
For instance for me this coming April:
No overlap on Monday. In fact the morning is free.
For me on Tuesday I have:
4 starting at 10
2 starting at 1:30 (plus a session to chair)
starting at 3 - OK for committees, but I also have a paper to give
On Wednesday:
3 starting at 8
Which overlap with things at 9 (session to chair) & 10
On Thursday;
3 starting at 8
Which overlap with something at 10:30
No overlap on Friday. In fact the afternoon is empty.
Now I know APEX and IPC Midwest are not built for Bev Christian. But other
people must have my same problem. I have tried to get the company to send
more people to no avail.
Can the following be considered:
Make more use of more than the three core days?
Start at 7:30?
Go longer than 5?
Have evening meetings?
If you are for or against any of this, please write to Greg Munie (He is
expecting this.) at:
[log in to unmask]
Regards,
Bev
RIM
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
|
