TECHNET Archives

November 2009

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 3 Nov 2009 02:33:43 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Hi Chris,



Are you sure you are talking about nanohardness and not microhardness?



If it's nanohardness, then the measured values are completely different from a common (microhardness) method due to the nature of nanohardness measurements.



Secondly (and even more important) on a plated sample (and particularly like ENIG with extremely thin layer of Au) the nanohardness readings will depend on the indentation load (read depth of penetration).



In general, you can not draw a direct comparison between nanohardness measurements done on a thick (your hard gold case) and extremely thin (ENIG case) plating.



Regards,



Vladimir

------Original Message------

From: Chris Mahanna

Sender: TechNet

To: [log in to unmask]

ReplyTo: TechNet E-Mail Forum

ReplyTo: Chris Mahanna

Sent: Nov 2, 2009 21:17

Subject: [TN] IAu hardness



Please help a simple EE.



From bare printed boards we are receiving nano-identation (hardness) values for hard (I assume Cobalt) gold in the 3000 MPa range.  Quick and dirty conversion yields ~300 Knoop/Vickers; right?

That sounds reasonable.



BUT, we're getting 6500 MPA for the ENIG.  Is this even possible?  Does anyone know if it is an indication of poor IAu?  Or maybe a poor nano-indentation tester?



Thanks,

Chris





---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet

To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)

To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------







SENTEC

11 Canadian Road, Unit 7.

Scarborough, ON M1R 5G1

Tel: (416) 899-1882

Fax: (905) 882-8812

www.sentec.ca


ATOM RSS1 RSS2