IPC-600-6012 Archives

November 2009

IPC-600-6012@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: UL marking on pwb's
From:
"Brown, Elaine" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Combined Forum of D-33a and 7-31a Subcommittees)
Date:
Wed, 4 Nov 2009 06:10:31 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
Only when required.  As long as the part is UL certifiable I don't see an issue with putting it on when it isn't required.  We don't because we have to do extra things to UL product(like matching prepreg vendors) and more failure opportunities(98% of what we do isn't UL).

 


-----Original Message-----
From: IPC-600-6012 [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jose A Rios
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 7:29 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [IPC-600-6012] UL marking on pwb's

is UL code marking a requirement on all pwb's by default?? 
or only when procurement documentation requires it ??

Joey Rios
PWB & Process Quality Eng'r
Endicott Interconnect Technologies
1093 Clark St.
Endicott, NY 13760
Office: 607-755-5896

ATOM RSS1 RSS2