TECHNET Archives

October 2009

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Brooks, Bill" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Brooks, Bill
Date:
Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:20:53 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (916 lines)
I would really appreciate getting the forum's viewpoint on via plugging with soldermask... There seems to be little reference material I can find on the subject... 

Please explain the process... 

What are the key concerns with plugging vias with soldermask? 
What are the hole size limitations? 
How is that affected by board thickness? 
What is the optimum hole diameter to use for a given board thickness? 
What are the worst case hole sizes to use large and small? 
How should this be specified on the fab drawing? 

Thank you in advance for all your help. 


Bill Brooks


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Chris Mahanna
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 12:09 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Lifted Leads

Agreed.
Linda, to the best of my knowledge Akrometrix is the only source for coplanarity during reflow. They offer testing services.
http://www.akrometrix.com/testingservices/index.php

Chris


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stadem, Richard D.
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 1:43 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Lifted Leads

I agree with that assessment.  Board warpage can be a contributing factor also.

 

From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 12:37 PM
To: [log in to unmask]; Stadem, Richard D.; [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Lifted Leads

 

Hi Linda & Dean,
While I take Linda by her words, 'pad cratering' is not out of the question, since the leads on connectors, whether they are gullwing-shaped or not are notoriously on-compliant.

In either case, the underlying root cause is connector body warping; for 'lifted leads' on heating and for 'pad cratering' on cooling.

Werner

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Tue, Oct 13, 2009 10:23 am
Subject: Re: [TN] Lifted Leads

Hi, Linda









I think what you may be seeing is more commonly called pad cratering, a common 









issue with lead-free soldering. This shows up mostly on BGAs with their 









relatively non-compliant connections, rather than gullwing leads. However, I 









have seen it happen on gullwing connectors, where the body of the connector is 









fastened to the PWB such that the compliant leads pull so hard as to lift the 









pads during reflow and cooldown. This can be confirmed using shadow moiré 









photography, where the image is strobed a number of time s during the temperature 









cycle in order to show the physical movement that takes place.









Rather than pursuing the visible confirmation of lead coplanarity during reflow 









using shadow moiré photography, you may be better off researching the 









cause/corrective actions of pad cratering.









Simply search the archives of Technet or Google up the term "pad cratering" and 









you will get a wealth of information, causes, and corrective measures to 









eliminate the issue. It can be caused by a number of design and process factors 









working together.



















-----Original Message-----









From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> ] On Behalf Of Linda Langley









Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 9:02 AM









To: [log in to unmask]









Subject: [TN] Lifted Leads



















Linda



















I know that you are signed on TechNet



















Could you please post question to all experts for me:



















We are reflowing 50pins CF card SMT connector and having high rate of the lifted 









leads (they are gull wings leads). We measured leads co planarity using CMM 









before reflow and it seems that all leads are meeting the spec. 



















My guess is that the component body is bowing during reflow process (we are dong 









Pb free reflow with the peak of 234°C) causing lifted leads.



















Somebody told me th
at there is a lab who can measure leads co planarity during 









reflow cycle. Is anybody aware of such as test?



















Thank you



















 



















Can anyone share some information, any help will be greatly appreciated.



















 



















 



















Linda Langley CIT



















Training Specialist



















Jabil Circuit



















248-292-6176





























---------------------------------------------------









Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0









To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in









the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet









To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 









[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)









To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 









[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest









Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives









Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for 









additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 









847-615-7100 ext.2815









------------------------------------------------
-----



















---------------------------------------------------









Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0









To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in









the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet









To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 









[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)









To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 









[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest









Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives









Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for 









additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 









847-615-7100 ext.2815









-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2