We recommend 150 to 240 micro inches.
Regards,
Bob Metcalf
Atotech Western Regional Manager
Cell 714-334-7667
E-Mail [log in to unmask]
This e-mail and any attachments hereto are business documents of Atotech
USA Inc. and may contain CONFIDENTIAL OR PROPRIETARY BUSINESS INFORMATION.
Unauthorized disclosure and/or use of information contained in this email
is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not read,
use, disseminate or copy this message or any other files transmitted with
it.
Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>
Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
10/21/2009 04:01 AM
Please respond to
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; Please respond to
[log in to unmask]
To
[log in to unmask]
cc
Subject
Re: [TN] ENIG Issue
Where are the recommended thickness values for Au/Ni on ENIG processes?
Some vendors go below 50 micro inches in the nickel.
Victor,
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Rex Waygood
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 3:35 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] ENIG Issue
Dear Bill
These are the causes that I have seen for the problem you describe.
Porous/thin gold permitting passivation of the Ni which the first reflow
makes much worse.
Thin Ni causing copper to migrate through and produce a non-solderable
surface under the gold, again the first reflow accelerates this.
I have also seen passivated Ni under gold but that just makes all the
components fall off in shear test or shock test, so it is reasonably
apparent.
I went through a period of wanting ENIG to disappear off the face of the
earth. However over the years the process window for ENIG seems to have
improved and our problems diminished.
Perhaps I should not have said that.........................
Rex
Rex Waygood
Technical Manager
Hansatech EMS provides value manufacturing through engineering and
quality
Hansatech EMS Limited
Benson Road
Nuffield Industrial Estate
Poole
01202 338200
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of [log in to unmask]
Sent: 21 October 2009 00:21
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] ENIG Issue
Fellow TechNetters: I ran into a problem and I am looking for more
information. We had some PCB made with ENIG for SMT applications. We
populated the backside, ran them through the convection oven, the solder
fillets were fine. Populated the first five (5) PCBs on the topside,
ran them through the convection oven, and the solder fillets were quite
bad, actually dewetted. Could not even be touched up. Tried two (2)
more random PCBs and got the same results. Never have run into this
before but have been told it is NOT a unique problem. Has anybody had
this happen? Have to tell our customer that they are not going to be
getting their PCBs on time and would rather not look like the north end
of a southbound mule.
Thanks in advance for your assistance.
Bill Black
1 631 667 9699 X13
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
|
