TECHNET Archives

October 2009

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stadem, Richard D." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Stadem, Richard D.
Date:
Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:21:43 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Reuven

I could not agree with you more. Systems such as the Hakko IR pre-heater station and the Hakko Hot Air system are the perfect solution.  



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Reuven Rokah

Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 9:10 AM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [TN] PWB Layout spacing queries



Hi Prashant,



Controlled IR soldering tool (with thermocouple and bottom PCB pre heating) is the best for such small BTC / QFNs components (without air pressure).







Best Regards



Reuven ROKAH 

Think green before printing this mail... Thanks



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of prashant chopra

Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 2:43 PM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: [TN] PWB Layout spacing queries



Hi,

 

I have a couple of queries with regard to the component spacing ---

 

1. What should be the minimum spacing between the QFP and the nearest chip components? (Assuming that the in case of failures the QFP will be reworked manually using the soldering iron).

 

2. What should be the minimum spacing between the QFN package and the nearest chip component? ( I am attaching a datasheet of QFN above).

 

3. What should be the minimum spacing between the 0402 component and the other nearest 0402 component or chip component?

 

Also, I have one query reagrding the QFN rework process (datasheet attached above) --

 

1. Ideally, in case of replacing the old QFN, the rework procedure should be similar to the BGA rework procees and using the rework station and nozzle.  But, one of our manufactuirng location is not having the rework station. They rework it manually, using the hot air gun to remove the component. Then they place the new QFN component and solder the small portion visible on the side edges (as shown in side view in data sheet) using the soldering iron. But I believe, this will not allow much solder to flow below the part and form contact there as major portion of the pad is below the body of the QFN. Is this process reliable? Will it have any impact on the performance over a period of time? is there any other reliable manual process which can be used for this rework?

 

Appreciate all your help and response. Thanks in advance.

 

Rgds

Prashant





Add whatever you love to the Yahoo! India homepage. Try now!





      Try the new Yahoo! India Homepage. Click here. http://in.yahoo.com/trynew



---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet

To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)

To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------


ATOM RSS1 RSS2