TECHNET Archives

October 2009

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:41:22 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (104 lines)
Hello Amol
 
Since all electronic components are now designed, registered and fabricated 
 using the metric system, would not it be easier to ask for a 0.5mm pitch  
device with lands of 0.25mm by 0.7mm? 
 
This is one of the windmills I continue to joust and I am  constantly 
curious why we in the US continue to be so wedded to such an  arcane and archaic 
measurement system as that which we  inherited/adopted from our English 
forefathers. 
 
Consider the following from the web:
 
The metric system originated in France in the 1790's, a few years after  
Jefferson's proposals. (note: Jefferson proposed to metric English  system for 
the US in the 1780 time frame where there were to 10 inches to  the foot, 
10 feet to a decade, 100 feet to a rood, 1000 feet to the furlong  and 10,000 
feet to the mile) During the mid-nineteenth century, as expanding  trade 
demanded a consistent set of measurements, use of the metric system spread  
through continental Europe. As they imported goods from Europe or exported 
goods  to Europe, Americans became increasingly aware of the metric system. In 
1866,  Congress legalized its use in an act reading: 
It shall be lawful throughout the United States of America to employ the  
weights and measures of the metric system; and no contract or dealing, or  
pleading in any court, shall be deemed invalid or liable to objection because  
the weights or measures expressed or referred to therein are weights or  
measures of the metric system.
As a result, the U. S. has been "metric" since 1866, but only in the sense  
that Americans have been free since that time to use the metric system as 
much  as they like. Although there has always been popular resistance to 
changing the  traditional measures, the metric system has actually enjoyed 
strong support from  American business leaders and scientists since the late 
nineteenth century. In  1875, the U.S. was one of the original signers of the 
Treaty of the Meter."  
and I might add that we continue to move towards complete metrication of 
our  national measurement systems "inch by inch"... ;-)  
Joe
 
 
In a message dated 10/16/2009 10:55:25 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:

I am  looking at a 19.7 mil pitch QFN device with a center pad and 
peripheral pads  at 9.8x27.5 mils, and a 176 pin fine pitch QFP with 11.8x63 mil 
pads with HASL  finish and without any soldermask in between the peripheral 
pads!...has  anybody seen this type of a board design before? Any stencil 
design  suggestions?

I have a couple of pictures I have requested Steve to post  for me 
regarding the parts ( I am awaiting Steve's  reply)


Thanks,
Amol





WARNING:  Export  Control 
This document may contain technical data within the definition of  the 
International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), and subject to the  
Export 
Control Laws of the U.S. Government.  Transfer of such data by  any means 
to a 
foreign person, whether in the United States or abroad,  without proper 
export 
authorization or other approval from the U.S.  Department of State is 
prohibited. 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  
This e-mail, and any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended  
recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential and  
protected from disclosure under the law. Any unauthorized review, use,  
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended  
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail, and delete/destroy  
all copies of the original message and attachments. 
Thank  you.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet  Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe,  send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the  subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery  of Technet send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To  receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]:  SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:  http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site  http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 
for additional information,  or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 
847-615-7100  ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2