LEADFREE Archives

September 2009

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Gambie <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum)
Date:
Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:46:13 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (195 lines)
 Gentlemen,

Also confirmed by the Cobham Group (ERA Technology) whom I consider to
be a reliable source.

http://www.era.co.uk/news/rfa_feature_23f.asp

Michael Gambie
Renishaw Plc

-----Original Message-----
From: Leadfree [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Marcus L. Thompson
Sent: 18 September 2009 02:36
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [LF] New ROHS proposals seek to change scope to encompass
all electrical and electronic equipment unless specifically excluded


 > Lets not  throw the baby out with the bath water, lets drown the kid!

Hmmmm...

Can't do that, either: Just read those bucket labels --


;o)


--- Previous Message in This Thread ---
Subject: Re:[LF] New ROHS proposals seek to change scope to encompass
all electrical and electronic equipment unless specifically excluded
From: Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Thursday, September 17, 2009 6:20:36 PM

> Denny,
> 
> Yes, this was from Gary Nevison at EDN 
> http://www.edn.com/blog/570000257/post/1930048993.html?nid=3614 (I 
> meant to include the link)
> 
> Here are several more links to articles which confirm that some
significant changes are in the works.
> 
> http://www.semi.org/cms/groups/public/documents/web_content/ctr_028917
> .pdf
> 
> http://www.tanzco.net/html/rohs_2.html (this is a very good article on

> the hazzards of RoHS "2")
> 
> Note that the proposal includes making RoHS a CE marking directive.
> 
> http://www.pb-free.info/cat8.htm
> 
> Lets not  throw the baby out with the bath water, lets drown the kid!
> 
> Bob Landman
> H&L Instruments, LLC
> 
> 
>   _____
> 
> From: [log in to unmask]
> To: [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:02:19 -0400
> Subject: Re: [LF] New ROHS proposals seek to change scope to encompass

> all electrical and electronic equipment unless specifically excluded
> 
>   
> Bob, the only thing I would add is that the information below is from
Gary Nevison of Newark/Farnell, as a column or a commentary.  I have
been nervous of Newark/Farnell since 2006 since they were the first I
knew of to propose a US style RoHS to keep states from enacting their
own patchwork of regulations.  (that has now happened with NEMA pushing
for HR 2420 introduction in the US House.        
>        
> I am not disagreeing, just waiting for other interpretations.   Other
recent EU notes have said maybe the EU parliatment elections made that
body a bit more conservative leaning.  Bad news - the green party
elected to the EU parliament is concentrating on running environemntal
matters. Then again, there is the EU Commission noted here - and can
someone on this forum explain how the Commission is appointed and who
they report to, if not the EU Parliament      
>        
> Denny Fritz      
>        
>        
> Gary Nevison, director of legislation and environmental affairs at
Newark and Farnell, contributes his views on the electronics supply
chain and environmental compliance's most critical topics -- ROHS (all
variations around the world), REACH, EUP, WEEE directives, and on
whatever else comes up in this ever evolving business channel.        
> 
>   
>   
>   -----Original Message-----
>   From: Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>
>   To: [log in to unmask]
>   Sent: Thu, Sep 17, 2009 4:53 pm
>   Subject: [LF] New ROHS proposals seek to change scope to encompass 
> all electrical and electronic equipment unless specifically excluded
>   
>         
> 
> 
> New ROHS proposals seek to change scope  Sep 17 2009 8:50AM |
Permalink |Comments (0) |        Following discussions between EU Member
States and the Council of Ministers, new   proposals have been put
forward by Sweden, which currently owns the EU   presidency, to amend
the scope of the ROHS (Restriction of Hazardous Substances)   directive.
Under the proposals the scope will change to encompass all electrical
and   electronic equipment unless specifically excluded. Currently there
are eight   product categories with binding examples of what products
fall within scope. A   recast, published in December 2008, also proposed
the phased in addition of   categories 8 and 9 (medical devices and
monitoring and control instruments).  Under the new proposals all
electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) will fall   within scope,
unless specifically excluded. Annex I (the 10 broad product
categories) and Annex II (binding list of product examples) have been
deleted   from the te
xt of the ROHS recast and=2  0will now sit, as before, within the WEEE
(Waste Electrical and-Electronic Equipment) directive, although Annex II
is   referred to as indicative as opposed to a binding list.  There are
new exclusions from the ROHS text such as large-scale stationary
industrial tools (LSIT), but the impact of the revised proposals is
clearly to   include products that are not currently in scope.  It is
also proposed to delete Annex III that lists four substances - BBP, DBP,
DEHP, and HBCDD for priority assessment, leading to possible
restrictions.  However, the Commission intends to adopt a methodology
for the review of the   restricted substances in Annex IV (the original
six possible, but unlikely) and   new substances where deemed necessary
in the future, based on the process set   out in Articles 69 to 72 of
the REACH (Registration, Evaluation and   Authorization of Chemicals)
regulations.  This would look to review a substance used in EEE, or the
waste
 derived from it,   that poses a hazard to human health or the
environment that is not adequately   controlled.  However, industry will
be interested in the scope, where any product that relies   on
electricity to function could be included, as well as the status of some
of   the grey area products. No longer will there be the "is it in scope
or is it   out" issues as with, for example, semiconductor development
tools at present, as   everything will be within scope unless
specifically excluded.  ROHS was previously   unclear, especially for
fixed installations, and it is   probable that these proposals are an
attempt to resolve this. However,   "equipment that is part of equipment
that is out of scope is itself out of   scope" remains in the text so
uncertainty is likely to continue.    Bob Landman  H&L Instruments, LLC
www.hlinstruments.com/          
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV

> 1.8d To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following

> text in the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree To 
> temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send:

> SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL) Search previous postings at: 
> http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web site 
> http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional 
> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 
> 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV
1.8d To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
text in the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree To
temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send:
SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL) Search previous postings at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email and any attachments are confidential and are for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you must not use or disclose the contents to any other person. Please immediately notify the sender and delete the email. Statements and opinions expressed here may not represent those of the company. Email correspondence is monitored by the company. This information may be subject to Export Control Regulation. You are obliged to comply with such Regulations

The parent company of the Renishaw Group is Renishaw plc, registered in England no. 1106260. Registered Office: New Mills, Wotton-under-Edge, Gloucestershire, GL12 8JR, United Kingdom. Tel +44 (0) 1453 524524
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2