LEADFREE Archives

September 2009

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:53:42 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
New ROHS proposals seek to change scope
Sep 17 2009 8:50AM | Permalink |Comments (0) |



Following discussions between EU Member States and the Council of Ministers, new proposals have been put forward by Sweden, which currently owns the EU presidency, to amend the scope of the ROHS (Restriction of Hazardous Substances) directive.
Under the proposals the scope will change to encompass all electrical and electronic equipment unless specifically excluded. Currently there are eight product categories with binding examples of what products fall within scope. A recast, published in December 2008, also proposed the phased in addition of categories 8 and 9 (medical devices and monitoring and control instruments).
Under the new proposals all electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) will fall within scope, unless specifically excluded. Annex I (the 10 broad product categories) and Annex II (binding list of product examples) have been deleted from the text of the ROHS recast and will now sit, as before, within the WEEE (Waste Electrical and-Electronic Equipment) directive, although Annex II is referred to as indicative as opposed to a binding list.
There are new exclusions from the ROHS text such as large-scale stationary industrial tools (LSIT), but the impact of the revised proposals is clearly to include products that are not currently in scope.
It is also proposed to delete Annex III that lists four substances - BBP, DBP, DEHP, and HBCDD for priority assessment, leading to possible restrictions.
However, the Commission intends to adopt a methodology for the review of the restricted substances in Annex IV (the original six possible, but unlikely) and new substances where deemed necessary in the future, based on the process set out in Articles 69 to 72 of the REACH (Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals) regulations.
This would look to review a substance used in EEE, or the waste derived from it, that poses a hazard to human health or the environment that is not adequately controlled.
However, industry will be interested in the scope, where any product that relies on electricity to function could be included, as well as the status of some of the grey area products. No longer will there be the “is it in scope or is it out” issues as with, for example, semiconductor development tools at present, as everything will be within scope unless specifically excluded.
ROHS was previously unclear, especially for fixed installations, and it is probable that these proposals are an attempt to resolve this. However, “equipment that is part of equipment that is out of scope is itself out of scope” remains in the text so uncertainty is likely to continue.

Bob Landman
H&L Instruments, LLC

www.hlinstruments.com/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2