 
| Sender: |
|
| X-To: |
|
| Date: |
Tue, 1 Sep 2009 08:16:52 -0500 |
| Content-Disposition: |
inline |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Chris,
I can see the potential for conflict as we say no soda strawing. however, I would apply the 25% "nonlamination" limit to the soda strawing.
My two cents.
Nick
Nick Koop
Sales Director
Minco Products, Inc
Ph 763 586-2846
Mobile 763 245-4825
>>> Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]> 8/31/2009 8:40 PM >>>
Hi all,
A customer has ask me to query the group about coverlayer sodastrawing.
From the applicable paragraphs in 6013 and 600, one could interpret sodastrawing as completely unacceptable unless it is a "nonlamination" , in which case it can reduce dielectric spacing by 25%.
Unfortunately there appears to be a disagreement about whether sodastrawing is to be included as a nonlamination.
Thanks,
Chris
|
|
|
