TECHNET Archives

August 2009

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Inge <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:12:53 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (99 lines)
Hi all,
the discussion reminds me of 'Salt Spray Test'.  In the ingress you can see 
an observandum that reads that 'this test does NOT correspond to a certain 
environment, but is a test for COMPARISON of various components ' (not exact 
phrase). Similarly, the mentioned solderability test can be used for 
comparing boards from different manufacturers, or you can use the test for 
best in show if you do a factor test. In such a case, the solderability test 
may not necessarily correspond to your daily process window.
/Inge


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ioan Tempea" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:51 PM
Subject: [TN] PCB wetting issue saga, final question


Hello Technos,



I have been asking questions on Technet about some wetting issues we see on 
a particular board and got many useful answers. In the end we've had the 
boards tested for solderability by respectable labs and the bare boards 
passed J-STD-003 testing with flying colors.



To back track a little bit, the original doubt came from the fact that in 
reflow, the solder does wet very well on both the board and the component in 
the component pin area, but would stop spreading pretty far from the land's 
end. It just stops spreading, even though the wetting angles at the stop 
points are very low, so denoting excellent wetting.



And here comes the question: why is testing per J-STD-003 done at 235 C and 
with a rather aggressive flux, when the reflow soldering takes place at 205 
C (HASL finish) using a milder flux (I am using WS, but it could very well 
be no-clean...)?



Thanks,



Ioan Tempea, ing.

Ingénieur Principal Fabrication / Sr. Manufacturing Engineer





30 ans déjà! - Already 30 years!

950 rue Bergar, Laval, Québec, H7L 5A1

t : 450-967-7100 ext : 244

Mtl : 514-990-5762

f : 450-967-7444

[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>

www.digico.cc <http://www.digico.cc/>

P N'imprimer que si nécessaire - Print only if you must




---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 
847-615-7100 ext.2815
----------------------------------------------------- 

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2