TECHNET Archives

August 2009

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stadem, Richard D." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Stadem, Richard D.
Date:
Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:25:32 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (105 lines)
I could not agree more with what Vladimir stated. Wetting balance tests and even dip-and-look solderability tests do not compare with the actual "test" of assembly and soldering of the board and components. If there are issues, one needs to put a TC on the PWB and find out exactly what the profile is, and if it appears to be adequate but there are still issues with wetting then those need to be determined using other means such as micro-sectioning, etc. Just because component leads and/or board pads solder up by themselves does not mean they can be eliminated. As a well-known reliability expert who occasionally contributes to this forum once said, "I can get good solder coverage on a toothpick."

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Vladimir Igoshev
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 8:11 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] PCB wetting issue saga, final question

Hi Ioan,

Unfortunately, any of the solderabilty tests (even the wetting balance one) very often are far away from the real life (real re-flow profiles) and the level of "comfort" they can give one can be very deceptive.

I always say that in order to solve a problem, one would have to get down to its root cause. 

It case of "solderabilty issues" the real root cause may have absolutely nothing to do with solderabilty of either component or the board. You can take a look at the case history on our website.

Regards,

Vladimir
SENTEC
------Original Message------
From: Ioan Tempea
Sender: TechNet
To: [log in to unmask]
ReplyTo: TechNet E-Mail Forum
ReplyTo: Ioan Tempea
Sent: Aug 11, 2009 08:51
Subject: [TN] PCB wetting issue saga, final question

Hello Technos,

 

I have been asking questions on Technet about some wetting issues we see on a particular board and got many useful answers. In the end we've had the boards tested for solderability by respectable labs and the bare boards passed J-STD-003 testing with flying colors.

 

To back track a little bit, the original doubt came from the fact that in reflow, the solder does wet very well on both the board and the component in the component pin area, but would stop spreading pretty far from the land's end. It just stops spreading, even though the wetting angles at the stop points are very low, so denoting excellent wetting.

 

And here comes the question: why is testing per J-STD-003 done at 235 C and with a rather aggressive flux, when the reflow soldering takes place at 205 C (HASL finish) using a milder flux (I am using WS, but it could very well be no-clean...)?

 

Thanks,

 

Ioan Tempea, ing.

Ingénieur Principal Fabrication / Sr. Manufacturing Engineer 

 

 

30 ans déjà! - Already 30 years!

950 rue Bergar, Laval, Québec, H7L 5A1

t : 450-967-7100 ext : 244

Mtl : 514-990-5762

f : 450-967-7444

[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> 

www.digico.cc <http://www.digico.cc/> 

P N'imprimer que si nécessaire - Print only if you must

 


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------



SENTEC
11 Canadian Road, Unit 7.
Scarborough, ON M1R 5G1
Tel: (416) 899-1882
Fax: (905) 882-8812
www.sentec.ca

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2