Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 15:37:28 +0800 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="gb2312" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Or you are talking about the marking?
-----Original Message-----
From: TGAsia [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Cony Su
Sent: Thursday, 6 August 2009 3:19 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TGAsia] 答复: quality acceptability criteria for Elec trolytic capacitor
Do you mean the CAP top swell issue in post reflow
?
-----Original Message-----
From: TGAsia [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of James Liu
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 3:14 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TGAsia] 答复: quality acceptability criteria for Elec trolytic capacitor
What do you want to know? Mark on the top side? Please describe your demand more clearly.
Best Regards,
James Liu 刘春光
Director, Technology & Standardization 技术与标准总监
IPC China
上海市长宁区延安西路1088号2303室
Suite 2303,#1088 West Yan'an Rd., Changning, Shanghai 200052 PRC
Tel: +86 21 5497 3435
Fax: +86 21 5497 3437
MP: +86 136 0133 3491
[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
www.ipc.org.cn<http://www.ipc.org.cn>
________________________________
发件人: TGAsia [[log in to unmask]] 代表 Lu Zhengqiang (RBAC/MOE2.4-AE) [[log in to unmask]]
发送时间: 2009年8月6日 14:40
收件人: Listserv TGAsia
主题: [TGAsia] [spam] quality acceptability criteria for Electrolytic capacitor
Hello, Guys,
I meet a problem: there is no description in IPC-A-610D for the acceptability criteria of Electrolytic capacitor, how to judge the failure? Or do we have some other acceptability criteria?
[cid:[log in to unmask]]
Thanks & BR
Lu
|
|
|