TECHNET Archives

August 2009

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:43:56 -0500
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Subject:
From:
Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (113 lines)
Brian,
Was the ESTEC study you refer to ever published?  If so, can you provide 
the reference?

Doug Pauls



Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]> 
Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
08/25/2009 01:17 AM
Please respond to
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; Please respond to
Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>


To
[log in to unmask]
cc

Subject
Re: [TN] ROSE Equivalency Factors






I agree with Doug. The European Space Agency (ESTEC) did a profound 
study with 4 different makes of tester and (I think) 6 different types 
of flux, cleaned according to manufacturers' recommendations and found 
there was absolutely zero correlation between them. It was impossible to 
determine a so-called equivalency factor (aka as fiddle factor or fudge 
factor) for any given instrument, as it varied greatly with different 
fluxes and different cleaning processes. The whole notion was dreamt up 
by NAFI in a nightmare; their testing was unscientific as they 
determined it for instruments very different for those used today with 
uncleaned boards, using a reference method that is, in itself, 
unscientific and imprecise.

Forget the whole notion of equivalence because none exists and the 
figures were, in any case, determined for instruments that were marketed 
a quarter of a century ago and whose only resemblance to todays' ones is 
that they may bear the same name. The ONLY way of using ionic 
contamination testers is, during qualification, to determine the mean 
and the standard deviation of the residual contamination on assemblies 
deemed safe for the intended purpose, individually for each type of 
board you make, using YOUR instrument under standardised conditions. 
During manufacture, the mean should fit within the Gaussian curve 
determined during qualification. If it deviates in either direction, 
then you know that your process has changed somewhere along the line 
between goods-in and cleaning.

If you have a certain book, Chapter 20 explains the danger of using 
equivalence factors and the use of mean/standard deviation for 
determining SAFE process control.

Brian

Richard Kraszewski wrote:
> Can someone please refresh my memory and tell me which document has the
> equivalency factors for the various ROSE testers? I seem to think that
> it was the IPC TR 583, but I don't see them there. Believe it may have
> been a Military document. 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Rich  Kraszewski
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text 
in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: 
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site 
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional 
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 
ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
> 

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2