TECHNET Archives

August 2009

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:11:20 +0000
Reply-To:
Subject:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
base64
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
From:
Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Hi Ioan,

Unfortunately, any of the solderabilty tests (even the wetting balance one) very often are far away from the real life (real re-flow profiles) and the level of "comfort" they can give one can be very deceptive.

I always say that in order to solve a problem, one would have to get down to its root cause. 

It case of "solderabilty issues" the real root cause may have absolutely nothing to do with solderabilty of either component or the board. You can take a look at the case history on our website.

Regards,

Vladimir
SENTEC
------Original Message------
From: Ioan Tempea
Sender: TechNet
To: [log in to unmask]
ReplyTo: TechNet E-Mail Forum
ReplyTo: Ioan Tempea
Sent: Aug 11, 2009 08:51
Subject: [TN] PCB wetting issue saga, final question

Hello Technos,

 

I have been asking questions on Technet about some wetting issues we see on a particular board and got many useful answers. In the end we've had the boards tested for solderability by respectable labs and the bare boards passed J-STD-003 testing with flying colors.

 

To back track a little bit, the original doubt came from the fact that in reflow, the solder does wet very well on both the board and the component in the component pin area, but would stop spreading pretty far from the land's end. It just stops spreading, even though the wetting angles at the stop points are very low, so denoting excellent wetting.

 

And here comes the question: why is testing per J-STD-003 done at 235 C and with a rather aggressive flux, when the reflow soldering takes place at 205 C (HASL finish) using a milder flux (I am using WS, but it could very well be no-clean...)?

 

Thanks,

 

Ioan Tempea, ing.

Ingénieur Principal Fabrication / Sr. Manufacturing Engineer 

 

 

30 ans déjà! - Already 30 years!

950 rue Bergar, Laval, Québec, H7L 5A1

t : 450-967-7100 ext : 244

Mtl : 514-990-5762

f : 450-967-7444

[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> 

www.digico.cc <http://www.digico.cc/> 

P N'imprimer que si nécessaire - Print only if you must

 


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------




SENTEC

11 Canadian Road, Unit 7.

Scarborough, ON M1R 5G1

Tel: (416) 899-1882

Fax: (905) 882-8812

www.sentec.ca


ATOM RSS1 RSS2