Shawn,
Your culprit is likely the plating topography. The current carrying (and thermal) constraint is the thinnest area. If you are paying for 1mil average on a .125 board, even class 3 could go down to 0.787 in the center.
If inner layers are involved, don't forget the making hole conductive (electroless) weak link.
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Upton, Shawn
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 10:49 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Via plating question
I bumped the diameter in the high current area up to 32mil already. I can't get the 15mil holes to a larger diameter w/o changing the board. I'll try running with more via's, and larger ones at that, and see what that results in, with just 1mil barrel plating then. [First board had less copper, no stitching of layers, thermal reliefs on the high current leads, and the board resistance was too high.]
Shawn Upton, KB1CKT
Test Engineer
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc
[log in to unmask]
603.626.2429/fax: 603.641.5336
-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 10:21 AM
To: [log in to unmask]; Upton, Shawn
Subject: RE: [TN] Via plating question
Shawn,
You may want to consider simply making the vias a larger diameter,
rather than increasing the plating. If there's room for the larger vias,
I think this would be an easier option.
Regards,
Jason Roetz, CID+
Master Designer
Eaton Corporation
Electrical Group, Industrial Controls Division
4201 North 27th Street
Milwaukee, WI. 53216
Telephone: 414-449-6397
Fax: 414-449-7319
[log in to unmask]
www.eaton.com
|