DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

July 2009

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
DesignerCouncil <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Designers Council Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Pete Waddell <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:06:08 -0700
Reply-To:
"(Designers Council Forum)" <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Subject:
From:
"[Jeffrey] [Jenkins]" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (91 lines)
I can't say I've ever cross-hatched anything, intentionally anyway.  But when I do have a large and continuous flat surface, whether it be copper or laminate, I try to create some surface irregularities to help improve soldermask adhesion.  

I usually do this with stitching vias or robber dots placed on a .250" (6.35mm). I have had instances  with soldermask flaking, especially from more exotic material and this seems to help alleviate the issue.

-Jeffrey

________________________________________


JEFFREY A. JENKINS, CID+
SR. PCB/CAD Designer
L-3 COMMUNICATIONS -
LINKABIT DIVSION
3033 Science Park Rd.
San Diego, CA 92121
Tel:  (858) 552-9832
Fax:  (858) 552-9487
[log in to unmask]

From: DesignerCouncil [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Pete Waddell
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 4:58 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [DC] Hashing-Out Hatching

This might be one of those archaic things from long, long ago ( in a land faaaaaar away) but I recall using cross hatching and it seems it had to do with either a solid plane acting as a heat sink at assembly, but again that is an old memory. I also remember that the x hatching on flex was for increased flexibility.
Anybody got a clue? 
p.

From: DesignerCouncil [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Scott Riley
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 7:51 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [DC] Hashing-Out Hatching

The majority of my designs are flex circuits and I use cross hatching for GND planes and large conductors all the time.  This is done for flexibility. However, I have never used it in on a PCB design. 

I'd be curious to know why it is recommended. 

From: DesignerCouncil [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jack Olson
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 7:18 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [DC] Hashing-Out Hatching

Greetings, 
 
I was just reading through the latest draft of IPC-2222,
and stumbled into the advice in section 10 regarding
"large conductive areas", where we are advised to 
use some kind of etched pattern (cross-hatching)
for any area larger than a 25mm diameter circle.
 
I have done this exactly once in the last 22 years, 
does anyone else do this?
 
Has anyone ever experienced a problem by NOT doing
this? (not counting soldermask over HASL)   
 
Jack
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the BODY (NOT the subject field):
SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of DesignerCouncil for vacation breaks send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext. 2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the BODY (NOT the subject field):
SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of DesignerCouncil for vacation breaks send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext. 2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the BODY (NOT the subject field):
SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of DesignerCouncil for vacation breaks send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext. 2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To temporarily stop/(restart) delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2