TECHNET Archives

June 2009

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)
Date:
Thu, 4 Jun 2009 14:17:28 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (132 lines)
Embedment is the consummate conclusion of two potted individuals in an
encapsulating environment.
Dewey

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Lee Whiteman
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 12:10 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Coating, Encapsulation, and Potting

Doug,

My shot at this...

1.  What would you consider to be a definition of "potting" and a
definition of "encapsulation"? 

According to Webster's, a device is encapsulated when it is "surrounded
by a gelatinous or membranous envelop." Based on this definition, I
would consider potting and encapsulation to be the same.

2.  Are there standard definitions for these somewhere?  They don't
exist in IPC as far as I know.

I'm not aware of any. You're entering new territory kid.

3.  What would you consider to be the boundary between conformal coating
and "potting or encapsulation"?  I have my own opinions but want to hear
yours.

Conformal coat is a 3 - 5 mil finish on a circuit card. The device is
not fully submerged.

Potting or Encapsulation fully submerges the device in a material.

4.  In what class would you consider an underfill to be in?

I would consider it a separate class from encapsulated materials and
conformal coating.

Hope this helps. Good Luck

Lee Whiteman, PMP
Senior Member Engineering Staff
L-3 Communications East
Telephone: (856) 338-3508
FAX: (856) 338-2906
E-Mail: [log in to unmask]
 
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Douglas Pauls
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 2:32 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Coating, Encapsulation, and Potting

Good afternoon all,

All this talk of underfill sparked a reminder of an IPC action item of 
mine.  Unknownst to most of you , I signed you all up on some of my 
committees.  There will be a new task group addressing potting and 
encapsulation, which will meet at the Fall IPC.  We already have
conformal 
coat task groups. 

So, I wish to initiate a series of questions and illuminating debate. 
Pardon me if I fall short on the illumination part (leave it alone
Dewey).

1.  What would you consider to be a definition of "potting" and a 
definition of "encapsulation"? 

2.  Are there standard definitions for these somewhere?  They don't
exist 
in IPC as far as I know.

3.  What would you consider to be the boundary between conformal coating

and "potting or encapsulation"?  I have my own opinions but want to hear

yours.

4.  In what class would you consider an underfill to be in?

That's enough homework for now. 

Doug Pauls
Rockwell Collins

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2