Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 4 Jun 2009 13:32:28 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Good afternoon all,
All this talk of underfill sparked a reminder of an IPC action item of
mine. Unknownst to most of you , I signed you all up on some of my
committees. There will be a new task group addressing potting and
encapsulation, which will meet at the Fall IPC. We already have conformal
coat task groups.
So, I wish to initiate a series of questions and illuminating debate.
Pardon me if I fall short on the illumination part (leave it alone Dewey).
1. What would you consider to be a definition of "potting" and a
definition of "encapsulation"?
2. Are there standard definitions for these somewhere? They don't exist
in IPC as far as I know.
3. What would you consider to be the boundary between conformal coating
and "potting or encapsulation"? I have my own opinions but want to hear
yours.
4. In what class would you consider an underfill to be in?
That's enough homework for now.
Doug Pauls
Rockwell Collins
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|