TECHNET Archives

June 2009

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Thu, 4 Jun 2009 12:41:12 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (454 lines)
You are right Brian. At Boeing, the attitude was "belt,  suspenders and 
'hero rope' to keep one's pant's on". This was 30 years  ago but I don't think 
much has changed beyond the internationalization already  mentioned.
 
Joe  
 
 
In a message dated 6/4/2009 6:38:44 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:

What is  sure is that both makers have critical avionics with at least 2 
x  redundancy, often 3 x, usually from different suppliers or  batches.

Brian

Reuven Rokah wrote:
> Hi Werner,
> I  hope Airbus will clarify this issue (LF in their electrical systems).
>  As far as I know from a technical presentation of Airbus I have seen 
(April  2004), the transition date was 2006.
> Is it include this airplane? I  don't know.
> 
> Reuven
> Think green before printing this  mail... Thanks
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From:  TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Werner Engelmaier /*
>  Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 3:47 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
>  Subject: Re: [TN] Flight 447
> 
>  I doubt very much that any  aircraft has Pb-free solder joints at this 
point—and any speculation about  Flight 447 at this point is not warranted.
> There are however, other  considerations.
> Boeing aircraft are not totally by (electrical) wire,  but have back-up 
hydraulic systems and pop-out emergency turbines that  generate electricity 
from the airplane velocity to operate the hydraulics [I  do not know if that 
applies to all Boeing aircraft, and whether or not  Airbuses have something 
similar—but Airbuses do not have hydraulic  systems].
> So, I do in fact choose my airline, to some degree at least,  on the 
planes they fly.
> Werner
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From:  Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Thu,  4 Jun 2009 8:24 am
> Subject: Re: [TN] Flight 447
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Agree with IngeMar!  With my recent trip involved 2 problem  aircrafts; 
one
> electrical wire fail, and the other with engin  problem(same model of 
aircraft),
> I would like to know a bit  more.  With technet resourceful background in 
high
> rel asy,  discussion could be beneficial to prevent future failure.  Not 
say  I
> can hand pick my aircraft upon travel, but picking an airline might  be 
in the
> consideration for me in my future travel.
>  --------------------------
> Sent using BlackBerry
> 
>  
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: TechNet  <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]  <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thu Jun 04 06:06:05 2009
>  Subject: Re: [TN] Flight 447
> 
> For the first time, I don't  agree fully with you, Brian.
> I think
>  calling the  discussion SCUTTLEBUTT and GOSSIP is little hard. Those who
> really do  that are journalists (not all)who make little extra money, 
while the
>  TN guys who were discussing are quite the opposite. I can't see bad guys 
 behind
> the messages that have passed, but professionel and  serious  engineers, 
who try
> to learn and understand from this sad  event. If the correspondens stays 
within
> etics and good manner, I  can't see why these guys had to be knocked out 
like
> that.
>  Sorry for having another opinion..
> /Inge
> 
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On  Behalf Of Brian Ellis
> Sent: torsdag 4 juni 2009 09:15
> To:  [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] Flight 447
> 
> I think  it ill-becomes any of us to speculate on the cause of this tragic
>  accident or to follow the equally speculative sequence of events.
> and  especially the implication of it being a European plane. A few years 
 ago,
> before I retired, I was in contact with experts in both Boeing  and 
Airbus about
> lead-free reliability. I was informed that they had a  common study group 
and
> that much of the avionics used was common to  both makers. My 
interlocutors were
> the Boeing Director of  Environmental Affairs and Senior Scientist of
> International  SHEA
> 
> Until (if ever) we have facts about this accident, IMHO,  we would be 
wiser to
> stop the speculation which really amounts to  nothing but SCUTTLEBUTT and 
GOSSIP.
> 
> Brian
> 
>  Ken Bloomquist wrote:
>> Hi Genny,
>>
>> I just  read this from the weather site that was ment
> ioned  earlier:
>> Hello Tim,   Check out "tin whiskers" in  Google  Some enlightening
>> information there  My cousin  works for BAE Systems, and has some 
theories on
>>  this&   His words, "The first aircraft to be 100% completely  ROHS 
compliant.
>> (NO LEAD in the solder.) I said it 5 years back..  They could not give 
me a
>> book of unlimited flight coupons on this  craft...   I'd swap it for a 
D90.
>> :)    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/brazil_plane
>> Be well!
>> Jim  H---
>>
>> The web site where I got this was
>>  http://www.weathergraphics.com/tim/af447/
>>
>>  KennyB
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From:  Genny Gibbard [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: Wednesday,  June 03, 2009 9:44 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re:  [TN] Test
>>
>> So was the Airbus 330 leadfree or not?   I was trying to google it and
>> wasn't finding any info on that,  other than the one comment on that
>>  link.
>>
>>
>> Genny
>>
>>  -----Original Message-----
>> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]  On Behalf Of Steve Gregory
>> Sent: June 3, 2009 10:02 AM
>>  To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [TN] Test
>>
>>  Everyone passed (GRIN). Why I did the test was because I was trying  to
>> post a message about the AF447 crash and my message kept  getting
>> kicked back with this:
>>
>> Your  message did not reach some or all of the intended  recipients.
>>
>>       Subject:   [TN] Off-topic Discussion; AF447 Crash
>>     Sent:   6/3/2009 10:12 AM
>>
>> The  following recipien
> t(s) could not be reached:
>>     [log in to unmask] on 6/3/2009 10:12 AM
>>     There was a SMTP communication problem with  the
>> recipient's email server.  Please contact your system  administrator.
>>              <OWA.OAIELECTRONICS.COM #5.5.0 smtp;550 Denied by  policy.>
>>
>>
>> Let's see if I can post it in  this reply...
>>
>> While it may never be known what caused  the tragic crash of AF447, it
>> raises some real questions about  what happened.
>>
>> Having flown for over 12-years while in  the Navy, any big accident
>> attracts my attention because of my  interest in aviation. I've been
>> following this event quite closely  to try and learn what might have
>> happened, and learned that there  have been several incidents involving
>> failures of the ADIRU (Air  Data Inertial Reference Unit) on A320's,
>> other A330's, and 777's  that caused the aircraft to depart controlled
>> flight. Below is  from a link about the AF447 crash that I was reading:
>>
>>  "Air France reported, that they had received an automatic message  from
>> the airplane reporting an electrical short circuit and the  failure of
>> multiple systems at 02:14Z. Air Traffic Control as well  as Military
>> Stations along the Atlantic coast of South America,  Africa, Portugal,
>> Spain and France have been alerted and attempted  to contact the
>> airplane without success. Attempts to locate the  airplane using civil
>> and military radars from both west and east  coasts20(including France)
>> of the Atlantic also proved  unsuccessful. The airplane entered service
>> in 2005 and had  accumulated 18870 flights hours. The captain had 11700
>> flight  hours, one of the first officers had 3000, the other 6600 flight 
 hours.
>>
>> Sources within Air France reported, that the  automatic message did not
>> only report an electrical short circuit,  but also the loss of cabin
>> pressure. This information has been  confirmed by FAB, who also stated,
>> that the position of the  airplane was given as N3.5777 W30.3744 in
>> that  message.
>>
>> New information provided by sources within  Air France suggests, that
>> the ACARS messages of system failures  started to arrive at 02:10Z
>> indicating, that the autopilot had  disengaged and the fly by wire
>> system had changed to alternate  law. Between 02:11Z and 02:13Z a
>> flurry of messages regarding  ADIRU and ISIS faults arrived, at 02:13Z
>> PRIM 1 and SEC 1 faults  were indicated, at 02:14Z the last message
>> received was an  advisory regarding cabin vertical speed. That sequence
>> of messages  could not be independently verified."
>>
>> Then I was  reading the comments this gentleman received after his
>>  meteorogical analysis of the weather conditions at the time of the
>>  crash:
>>
>>  http://www.weathergraphics.com/tim/af447/
>>
>> and up  popped the topic of lead-free. You'll see that in the  comments.
>>
>>
>> Then I found this from an  article that Mike Buetow wrote back in  2004:
>>
>>
>> "The sky was=2
> 0the limit  for lead-free, literally. Declarations from
>> Europe and elsewhere  led us to believe that electronics for military
>> and aerospace  applications would be exempt from bans on lead.
>> Suppliers to  companies in those sectors were flying high, believing
>> that under  the EU directives (WEEE and RoHS) they were off the  radar.
>>
>> None of that is stopping Airbus from taking a  closer look, querying
>> its suppliers on their use of lead and other  materials on the EU hit 
list.
>> In a Jan. 9 letter, a copy of which  was obtained by PCD&M, Airbus
>> France director of procurement  quality and supply chain equipment
>> Jean-Philippe Bedos explained:  "For Airbus, both directives and the
>> associated planning are  applicable."
>>
>> By contract, the European airplane  consortium prohibits its equipment
>> suppliers from using materials  "forbidden by national and
>> international regulations, or likely to  be...." The statement clearly
>> implies WEEE and RoHS. With that in  mind, Airbus submitted to its
>> suppliers a 46-question form asking  about lead use. Responses, wrote
>> Bedos, will be analyzed by Airbus  and "will initiate an exchange and a
>> follow up of your process and  the possible corrective actions to 
mitigate the
> risks."
>>  That's not all. The consortium is also putting the onus for
>>  end-of-life disposal squarely on its suppliers. In an October
>>  presentation by Airbus UK's environmental affairs coordinator, a  slide
>> listing environmental requirements for Airbus'  supplier
> s included this
>> statement: "In particular for  electrical and electronic equipment,
>> supplier responsibility for  the elimination of the corresponding waste
>> at the end of life of  the delivered product including packaging,
>> unless otherwise agreed  with Airbus." (Ever tried to throw out a
>> plane? It's not as easy  as it looks.)
>>
>> For products delivered after July 1,  2006, Airbus is mandating its
>> suppliers attest in writing that  their products contain no lead,
>> cadmium or other substances  (including polybrominated biphenyls, or
>> PBBs; and polybrominated  dephenyl ethers, or PBDEs) banned per the RoHS
> Directive.
>>  And if Airbus succumbs, it says here it's only a matter of time  until
>> Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and the other  primes follow.
>>
>> ...For now, confusion reigns. Will it  end before airplane parts rain,
>>  too?"
>>
>>
>> So, it begs the question; COULD this  have something to do with
>> lead-free  avionics?
>>
>> Steve
>>
>> P.S. During my  searches, I ran across this. If you're into aviation,
>> you'll like  it.
>>
>>  http://www.gillesvidal.com/blogpano/cockpit1.htm
>>
>>  ---------------------------------------------------
>> Technet Mail  List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
>>  unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text  in
>> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To  temporarily halt
>> or
>> (re-start) delivery of Technet  send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
>> Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To  rece
> ive ONE mailing per day of all the
>> posts: send e-mail  to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
>> archives of  previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
>> visit  IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
>> for  additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at
>>  [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
>>  -----------------------------------------------------
>>
>>  ---------------------------------------------------
>> Technet Mail  List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
>>  unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text  in
>> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To  temporarily halt
>> or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail  to
>> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE  mailing
>> per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
>>  [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
>> Search the archives of  previous posts at:
>> http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit  IPC web site
>>  http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
>> for additional  information, or contact Keach Sasamori at
>> [log in to unmask] or  847-615-7100 ext.2815
>>  -----------------------------------------------------
>>
>>  ---------------------------------------------------
>> Technet Mail  List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
>>  unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text  in
>> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To  temporarily halt
>> or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to  [log in to unmask]: SET
>> Technet NOMAIL or (MAI
> L) To receive  ONE mailing per day of all the
>> posts: send e-mail to  [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
>> archives of  previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
>> visit  IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
>> for  additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at
>>  [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
>>  -----------------------------------------------------
>>
>  
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet  Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
>  unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in 
the  BODY
> (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or  
(re-start)
> delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET  Technet NOMAIL 
or
> (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the  posts: send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the  archives of previous 
posts at:
> http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please  visit IPC web site 
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
>  for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]  
or
> 847-615-7100 ext.2815
>  -----------------------------------------------------
> 
>  ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List  provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
> To unsubscribe, send  a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the  subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start)  delivery of Technet send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet  NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the  posts
> : send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet  Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at:  
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site  
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
> additional  information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
>  847-615-7100 ext.2815
>  -----------------------------------------------------
> 
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
>  information, privileged material (including material protected by the
>  solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute  
non-public
> information. Any use of this information by anyone other  than the 
intended
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this  transmission in 
error, please
> immediately reply to the sender and  delete this information from your 
system.
> Use, dissemination,  distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by
> unintended  recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
> 
>  ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List  provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
> To unsubscribe, send  a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the  subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start)  delivery of Technet send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet  NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send  e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the  archives of previous posts at: 
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please  visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.
> 3.16  for
> additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at  [log in to unmask] or
> 847-615-7100 ext.2815
>  -----------------------------------------------------
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List  provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
> To unsubscribe, send  a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the  subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start)  delivery of Technet send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or  (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to  
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous  posts at: 
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site  
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information,  or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] 
or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
>  -----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet  Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe,  send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the  subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery  of Technet send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To  receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]:  SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:  http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site  http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 
for additional information,  or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 
847-615-7100  ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

**************Limited Time Offers: Save big on popular laptops at Dell 
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1221354145x1201369495/aol?redir=http:%2F
%2Fad.doubleclick.net%2Fclk%3B215221161%3B37268813%3By)

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2